Tollef Fog Heen escreveu isso aí:
> ]] Antonio Terceiro
>
> > Another possibility -- probably better than basing off the existing
> > source package -- is to gem2deb the current upstream version, import
> > that into git, and then pull the relevant bits from the old packaging,
> > in special debi
]] Antonio Terceiro
> Another possibility -- probably better than basing off the existing
> source package -- is to gem2deb the current upstream version, import
> that into git, and then pull the relevant bits from the old packaging,
> in special debian/copyright, bit from debian/control, manpage
Tollef Fog Heen escreveu isso aí:
> ]] Antonio Terceiro
>
> > Nice! I am willing to help with this, do you want to comaintain it
> > inside the Ruby team?
>
> Sure, that'd work fine for me.
>
> I need to make sure it works well on various Ubuntu versions and squeeze
> too, but that should be do
Bryan McLellan escreveu isso aí:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > I though about first asking the Opscode people, or to look at their
> > Debian package sources, to see whether we can minimize our effort to get
> > newest chef* packages on sid.
>
> I did a gem2deb co
Tollef Fog Heen escreveu isso aí:
> I don't _think_ newer ohai is incompatible with older chef, so I think
> just uploading should be ok.
I've just uploaded the new ohai, then.
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
]] Antonio Terceiro
> Nice! I am willing to help with this, do you want to comaintain it
> inside the Ruby team?
Sure, that'd work fine for me.
I need to make sure it works well on various Ubuntu versions and squeeze
too, but that should be doable-ish.
> I though about first asking the Opscode
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I though about first asking the Opscode people, or to look at their
> Debian package sources, to see whether we can minimize our effort to get
> newest chef* packages on sid.
I did a gem2deb conversion of the Chef packages about a year ag
Hi,
Tollef Fog Heen escreveu isso aí:
>
> Hi,
>
> ]] Antonio Terceiro
>
> > FYI: I finished the ohai packaging myself, but I did not upload it yet.
> > I'm not sure about compatibility with the old chef, and it seems that
> > upgrading chef will not be trivial.
>
> I'm working on getting a new
Hi,
]] Antonio Terceiro
> FYI: I finished the ohai packaging myself, but I did not upload it yet.
> I'm not sure about compatibility with the old chef, and it seems that
> upgrading chef will not be trivial.
I'm working on getting a newer chef into the archive and plan on getting
the current ve
Antonio Terceiro escreveu isso aí:
> Will the current version of chef in unstable work with this new ohai?
> Are you going to update chef after? ;-) (in any case, if the current
> chef does not work with this new ohai, then we should prevent ohai from
> migrating to testing until we get a compatibl
Praveen A escreveu isso aí:
> This transition work has been going on for some time, I'm happy to see
> it ready. Ohai is not yet ported to ruby 1.9, so I'm building it for
> ruby 1.8 only. The two failing tests are reported upstream [1], if
> they fix it we can upload a new version for ruby 1.9. If
2012/2/2 Praveen A :
> 2012/2/2 Jordon Bedwell :
>> Where can I check out the source and the tests you're doing? The rspec
>> test i did (from the source on Github) on my Ruby1.9.3 install
>> including testing it in Pry returned everything working and fine.
> May be they fixed it in git repo,
I tr
2012/2/2 Jordon Bedwell :
> Where can I check out the source and the tests you're doing? The rspec
> test i did (from the source on Github) on my Ruby1.9.3 install
> including testing it in Pry returned everything working and fine.
The current released version, 0.6.10 from rubygems.org
http://ruby
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Praveen A wrote:
> This transition work has been going on for some time, I'm happy to see
> it ready. Ohai is not yet ported to ruby 1.9, so I'm building it for
> ruby 1.8 only. The two failing tests are reported upstream [1], if
> they fix it we can upload a new v
This transition work has been going on for some time, I'm happy to see
it ready. Ohai is not yet ported to ruby 1.9, so I'm building it for
ruby 1.8 only. The two failing tests are reported upstream [1], if
they fix it we can upload a new version for ruby 1.9. If anyone wants
help fix these two tes
15 matches
Mail list logo
