Re: RFS: facterdb and ruby-rspec-puppet-facts

2021-09-27 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 21-09-07 18:43:58, Gabriel Filion wrote: > oh no, I'm embarrassed to have forgotten this. the "upstream" branch > was also missing. > > I've pushed both branches to both repositories. Took a while, but I've uploaded both now to unstable. Cheers, Georg

Re: RFS: facterdb and ruby-rspec-puppet-facts

2021-09-07 Thread Gabriel Filion
On 2021-09-07 6:05 p.m., Georg Faerber wrote: Could someone please review my work and help me out with upload to debian archive? I'm neither a DD nor a DM so I can't send there myself. * https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/facterdb * https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rspec-puppet-facts

Re: RFS: facterdb and ruby-rspec-puppet-facts

2021-09-07 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 21-08-21 19:21:26, Gabriel Filion wrote: > Today I've worked on fixing tests for autopkgtest for both facterdb > and ruby-rspec-puppet-facts. > > Since both of them never made it to testing (because of the failing > autopkgtest), I've also decided to upgrade both of them to the current > l

RFS: facterdb and ruby-rspec-puppet-facts

2021-08-21 Thread Gabriel Filion
Hello, Today I've worked on fixing tests for autopkgtest for both facterdb and ruby-rspec-puppet-facts. Since both of them never made it to testing (because of the failing autopkgtest), I've also decided to upgrade both of them to the current latest upstream release. Could someone please r