Re: RFH: Need an explanation to fix #952027

2020-03-25 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2020, 10:54 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: [..] > > The output regarding ":block=>#" doesn't match the expectation. Of > > course I could easily change the expected result to match the current > > output. >

Re: RFH: Need an explanation to fix #952027

2020-03-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > I just worked on fixing #952027. The issue at hand is easily fixable and I > already pushed the patch to Git. Unfortunately two more test failures appeared > recently, both of the same kind: > > https://salsa.debian.org/rub

RFH: Need an explanation to fix #952027

2020-03-24 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi, I just worked on fixing #952027. The issue at hand is easily fixable and I already pushed the patch to Git. Unfortunately two more test failures appeared recently, both of the same kind: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-declarative/-/jobs/627635#L542 > dup of arguments#test_0001_anony