On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:15:11PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Ondřej Surý [131024 21:28]:
> > What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
> > dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
> > rack 1.5)
>
> While preparing a ruby-rack-1
* Ondřej Surý [131024 21:28]:
> What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
> dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
> rack 1.5)
While preparing a ruby-rack-1.4 package is easy, it will take a
while to get through NEW. (Apparently, queue leng
On 10/26/2013 07:34 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 10/26/2013 03:47 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
rack 1.
On 10/26/2013 03:47 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
rack 1.5)
This is another idea, which could so
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
> dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
> rack 1.5)
This is another idea, which could solve the problem, and
I guess it really depends
At Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:22:06 +0200,
Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
> dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
> rack 1.5)
+1
---
Youhei SASAKI
GPG fingerprint:
4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4
What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as
dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to
rack 1.5)
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.de
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:57:58PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > I am planning to revert ruby-rack on unstable back to upstream version
> > > 1.4.x by using an epoch. ruby-rack 1.5.x breaks rails session
> > > management, and as a consequence,
Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > I am planning to revert ruby-rack on unstable back to upstream version
> > 1.4.x by using an epoch. ruby-rack 1.5.x breaks rails session
> > management, and as a consequence, redmine.
>
> Thanks for taking care of this.
> ...
> About the epoch
Hi Antonio,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 04:35:54PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am planning to revert ruby-rack on unstable back to upstream version
> 1.4.x by using an epoch. ruby-rack 1.5.x breaks rails session
> management, and as a consequence, redmine.
Thanks for taking
Hello everyone,
I am planning to revert ruby-rack on unstable back to upstream version
1.4.x by using an epoch. ruby-rack 1.5.x breaks rails session
management, and as a consequence, redmine.
More details in the correspondin bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711236
For now, t
11 matches
Mail list logo
