libtidy-ruby and new Debian Ruby packaging policy

2011-08-19 Thread Cédric Boutillier
recommended packaging tool. The library libtidy-ruby you maintain is a building dependency (required to run the test suite) for the package ruby-bluecloth, maintained by the pkg-ruby-extras team. Would you consider applying this new packaging policy to your package and maybe even maintaining this

Re: Repackaging libruby-hmac to new ruby packaging policy

2011-05-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Vasudev Kamath escreveu isso aí: > On 14:05 Sat 07 May , Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Vasudev Kamath escreveu isso aí: > > > Hi, > > > I'm member of team pkg-ruby-extras and I would like to repackage > > > libhmac-ruby to meet new Ruby policy in Wheezy[1]. I would like your > > > approval before

Re: Repackaging libruby-hmac to new ruby packaging policy

2011-05-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 14:05 Sat 07 May , Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Vasudev Kamath escreveu isso aí: > > Hi, > > I'm member of team pkg-ruby-extras and I would like to repackage > > libhmac-ruby to meet new Ruby policy in Wheezy[1]. I would like your > > approval before I can start working on the package > > > >

Re: Repackaging libruby-hmac to new ruby packaging policy

2011-05-07 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Vasudev Kamath escreveu isso aí: > Hi, > I'm member of team pkg-ruby-extras and I would like to repackage > libhmac-ruby to meet new Ruby policy in Wheezy[1]. I would like your > approval before I can start working on the package > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/04/msg00109.html P

Repackaging libruby-hmac to new ruby packaging policy

2011-05-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi, I'm member of team pkg-ruby-extras and I would like to repackage libhmac-ruby to meet new Ruby policy in Wheezy[1]. I would like your approval before I can start working on the package [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/04/msg00109.html Thanking you, -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.c

Re: Packaging Policy

2006-06-27 Thread Thomas Fini Hansen
Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote: Hi TRANS, On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:17:19AM -0400, TRANS wrote: Hi, I'm workng on library/package related systems for Ruby and Debian's packaging policy puts a bit of a kink in things. According to the packaging policy 3rd-party packages are

Re: Packaging Policy

2006-06-27 Thread vincent . fourmond
Hello > >As you probably know, build/install tools in Ruby tend to suck > very badly,> so perhaps the change won't be as trivial as we would like to. About that, I wanted to say that I've been developping for my own needs a replacement for mkmf.rb which aims at full (if possible) compatibil

Re: Packaging Policy

2006-06-26 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
Hi TRANS, On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:17:19AM -0400, TRANS wrote: > Hi, > > I'm workng on library/package related systems for Ruby and Debian's > packaging policy puts a bit of a kink in things. According to the > packaging policy 3rd-party packages are installed directly

Packaging Policy

2006-06-25 Thread TRANS
Hi, I'm workng on library/package related systems for Ruby and Debian's packaging policy puts a bit of a kink in things. According to the packaging policy 3rd-party packages are installed directly into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/, right along side all the standard ruby distribution libs. I re