Re: Lintian check for Ruby PKG

2013-09-07 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Jonas, On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:15:58PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote: > Updates: https://github.com/hggh/ruby-lintian Thanks! I think you should go ahead and turn those checks into a proper patch to lintian and submit them for inclusion. -- Antonio Terceiro signature.asc Description: Dig

Re: Lintian check for Ruby PKG

2013-08-27 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello Antonio, > Thanks a lot for working on this! I have some suggestions on the wording > of the tag descriptions, see the attached patch. thanks - I have included it. > maybe lintian already has some logic to detect a package as transitional that > is more ellaborate than that? you are corre

Re: Lintian check for Ruby PKG

2013-08-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Jonas, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:13:13PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote: > Hello, > > as discussed in the Ruby Bof on Debconf, I have written Lintian checks for > our Ruby PKG: > > https://github.com/hggh/ruby-lintian > > The lintian checks includes the following three checks: > > * ol

Lintian check for Ruby PKG

2013-08-18 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, as discussed in the Ruby Bof on Debconf, I have written Lintian checks for our Ruby PKG: https://github.com/hggh/ruby-lintian The lintian checks includes the following three checks: * old naming schema (libfoo-ruby) if it's no transitional package * depends on ruby1.8 * depen