Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:42:44PM +0100]:
> Hi,
>
> So, apparently I needed the feeling that I didn't have to worry anymore with
> Ruby to get motivated again. I've spent some time today working on a
> replacement for our packaging scripts, using dh7, and I made good progress.
>
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:05:07PM +0100]:
> Well, the part of setup.rb that we are interested in is rather small.
> And setup.rb has lots of things that we don't need, like hook support,
> and support for ancient versions of Ruby.
>
> Also, there are some things that we surely w
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 21:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, apparently I needed the feeling that I didn't have to worry anymore with
> Ruby to get motivated again. I've spent some time today working on a
> replacement for our packaging scripts, using dh7, and I made good progress.
>
>
On 09/01/11 at 12:56 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Don't you think that we could make dh_ruby use setup.rb itself instead
> of reimplementing all its features? Even if we had to make some changes
> to setup.rb to make it fit better, it would be easier to get all it's
> features that way.
Well,
Hi Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> Hi,
>
> So, apparently I needed the feeling that I didn't have to worry anymore with
> Ruby to get motivated again. I've spent some time today working on a
> replacement for our packaging scripts, using dh7, and I made good progress.
>
> It's called g
Hi,
So, apparently I needed the feeling that I didn't have to worry anymore with
Ruby to get motivated again. I've spent some time today working on a
replacement for our packaging scripts, using dh7, and I made good progress.
It's called gem2deb. It's built as a set of small scripts, but combinin
6 matches
Mail list logo
