On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:00:06 -0200 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Francesco Poli escreveu isso aí:
> > Hi everybody,
> > I've been informed by Serafeim (Cc:ed) that apt-listbugs is being
> > discussed as one of the blockers for the ruby 1.8.x → 1.9.x migration
> > in Debian:
> > http://lists.debian.org/
Francesco Poli escreveu isso aí:
> Hi everybody,
> I've been informed by Serafeim (Cc:ed) that apt-listbugs is being
> discussed as one of the blockers for the ruby 1.8.x → 1.9.x migration
> in Debian:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/01/msg00011.html
>
> Since I am one of the two co-mai
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:25:32 -0500 Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 02:00 PM, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > As far as the test-unit library is concerned, it is used in a test
> > suite currently run at package build time.
> > It was mentioned as one of the libraries dropped from ruby 1.9.x in
> > h
On 01/04/2012 02:00 PM, Francesco Poli wrote:
As far as the test-unit library is concerned, it is used in a test
suite currently run at package build time.
It was mentioned as one of the libraries dropped from ruby 1.9.x in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/06/msg00050.html
No further inv
Hi everybody,
I've been informed by Serafeim (Cc:ed) that apt-listbugs is being
discussed as one of the blockers for the ruby 1.8.x → 1.9.x migration
in Debian:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/01/msg00011.html
Since I am one of the two co-maintainers of apt-listbugs, I would like
to chime
5 matches
Mail list logo