Re: RFS: ruby-ruby-dep

April 6, 2020 1:04 AM, "Daniel Leidert" wrote: > Hi Kiran, > > I reviewed your package. Some notes: > > Am Samstag, den 04.04.2020, 22:32 + schrieb ki...@disroot.org: > >> I prepared the packaging of ruby-ruby-dep. It is lintian clean and tested >

RFS: ruby-gem-isolator

-isolator Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

RFS: ruby-ruby-dep

Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

RFS: ruby-simple-po-parser

-simple-po-parser Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

Re: RFS: ruby-concord

and pushed to ruby-team on salsa. I don't think mentioning it > is a dependency of gitlab in description is useful (it is useful in an > itp), so removed it. > removed and pushed to my repo > > Regards, > > kiran s kunjumon > > > > > -- kiran

RFS: ruby-guard-rspec

/ruby-guard-rspec Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

RFS: ruby-procto

-procto Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems

gem named "parser" but > ruby-parser package include "ruby_parser" gem. Any ideas to move > forward? > > Should we package both gems? > > Praveen > > > -- kiran

RFS: ruby-concord

to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

Re: RFS: ruby-adamantium

March 10, 2020 11:43 AM, "Utkarsh Gupta" wrote: > Hi Kiran, > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:03 AM wrote: > >> Consider to review and upload it. > > The extended description is too short. Could you please add a bit more > of an explanation to it? > Add

RFS: ruby-adamantium

-adamantium Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon

RFS: ruby-abstract-type

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-abstract-type. It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-abstract-type Consider to review and upload it. Regards, kiran s kunjumon