nk to the survey:
https://surveys.debian.net/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=142968&lang=en
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gitlab/
Thank you for your time
Best regards,
Vinay
2F7E32FC9C01622BC797E60AD3FDE3D93A1FCF50
On 06/04/23 21:31, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 1 2023 at 03:58:30 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay
wrote:
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the new package ruby-apps-store-connect
[1] required for Gitlab.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-app-store-connect
please
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the new package
ruby-google-apis-cloudresourcemanager-v1 [1] required for gitlab 15.9.2
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-google-apis-cloudresourcemanager-v1
---
Thank You
Vinay
2F7E32FC9C01622BC797E60AD3FDE3D93A1FCF50
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the new package ruby-apps-store-connect [1]
required for Gitlab.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-app-store-connect
Thank You
Vinay
2F7E32FC9C01622BC797E60AD3FDE3D93A1FCF50
OpenPGP_0xD3FDE3D93A1FCF50.asc
Description: OpenPGP public
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package
ruby-google-apis-compute-v1 [1], have updated it to version 0.57.0-1
(targeting experimental)
Required for GitLab 15.9.2
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-google-apis-compute-v1
Thank You
Vinay
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package
ruby-omniauth-alicloud [1], have updated it to version 2.0-1 (targeting
experimental)
Required for GitLab 15.9.2
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-omniauth-alicloud
Thank You
Vinay
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package
ruby-google-apis-sqladmin-v1beta4 [1], have updated it to version
0.41.0 (targeting experimental)
Required for GitLab 15.9.2
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-google-apis-sqladmin-v1beta4
Thank You
Vinay
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package ruby-et-orbi [1],
have updated it to v1.2.7 (targeting experimental)
Required for GitLab 15.9.2
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-et-orbi
Thank You
Vinay
2F7E32FC9C01622BC797E60AD3FDE3D93A1FCF50
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-recaptcha [1], updated it to
latest upstream version 5.12.3
required for GitLab 15.8.4.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-recaptcha
Best
Vinay
2F7E 32FC 9C01 622B C797 E60A D3FD E3D9 3A1F CF50
Hello team,
Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-lockbox [1] updated it to
v1.1.1 (targeting experimental)
Required for Gitlab 15.8.4
[1] -- https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-lockbox
Vinay
2F7E 32FC 9C01 622B C797 E60A D3FD E3D9 3A1F CF50
Hello team,
Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-net-ldap [1] updated to
latest upstream (targeting experimental)
Required for Gitlab 15.8.4
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-net-ldap
Vinay
2F7E 32FC 9C01 622B C797 E60A D3FD E3D9 3A1F CF50
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the new package
ruby-google-apis-sqladmin-v1beta4 [1] ( targeting experimental)
Required for GitLab 15.7.6
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-google-apis-sqladmin-v1beta4
Vinay
OpenPGP_0xD3FDE3D93A1FCF50.asc
Description: OpenPGP
e refs to
'salsa.debian.org:ruby-team/ruby-aws-sdk-core.git'
or have pushed to my fork here [2]
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-aws-sdk-core
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-aws-sdk-core
---
Best
Vinay
OpenPGP_0xD3FDE3D93A1FCF50.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
On 01/03/23 14:47, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1 2023 at 01:00:15 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay
wrote:
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-i18n-data [1] required
for GitLab 15.7.6
Have updated it to the version 0.13.0
Please merge the UNRELEASED entry with
On 01/03/23 01:19, Vinay wrote:
fjdiafoklandckakfdkfal
Ignore
sorry by mistake it was sent
fjdiafoklandckakfdkfal
OpenPGP_0xD3FDE3D93A1FCF50.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Team,
Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-i18n-data [1] required for
GitLab 15.7.6
Have updated it to the version 0.13.0
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-i18n-data
---
Best
Vinay Keshava
Hello Team,
Requesting Sponsorship for the new package ruby-aws-sdk-s3 (1.117.2-1)
This gem is listed here [2] and is a dependency of Gitlab 15.7.6
[1] hhttps://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-aws-sdk-s3
[2] https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191
Regards.
*Vinay
/TaskTracker/-/issues/191
Regards.
*Vinay Keshava *
/TaskTracker/-/issues/191
Regards.
*Vinay Keshava *
Hello Team,
the package ruby-fog-local [1] can be re-uploaded to unstable (all the
breaking changes are fixed ) as gitlab 15.6 is uploaded to experimental
Requesting for Sponsorship
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-fog-local
*Regards,*
*Vinay *
/-/issues/191
Regards.
*Vinay Keshava *
/-/issues/191
Regards.
*Vinay Keshava *
Hello Team,
Requesting Sponsorship for the package ruby-fogbugz with re-uploading to
unstable
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-fogbugz
It has no reverse dependencies
Regards
Vinay Keshava
> 1. ruby-telesign 2.2.3
-Original Message-
From: Pirate Praveen
To: debian-ruby
Sent: Mon, Dec 26, 2022 5:56 pm
Subject: Re: [RFS]
telesign,request-store,view-component,fog-local,aws-sdk-s3,fogbugz
> 5. ruby-fogbugz 0.2.1 -> 0.3.0
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/
://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191
--
Regards,
Vinay Keshava
Hello Team,
I have updated ruby-html-pipeline to 2.14.3, the reason for sending RFS
is that this package is listed here [1], required for gitlab 15.6.1 .
Also ruby-task-list rebuild fails due to missing ruby-commonmarker
dependency for ruby-html-pipeline
have fixed https://bugs.debian.org/c
On 02/01/23 23:07, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
On 30/12/22 1:14 am, Vinay wrote:
Hello Team,
I have packaged ruby-oj-introspect (0.7.1)
This gem is required for Gitlab, please review it and requesting for
sponsorship
Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package is listed here
ruby-html-pipeline
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-html-pipeline
[1] https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027340
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996234
[4] https
On 01/01/23 17:26, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
On 01/01/23 3:37 pm, Vinay wrote:
Hello Team,
ruby-aws-sdk-kms (1.24.0-3~bpo11+1) is required for ruby-aws-sdk-s3
in bullseye-backports-staging
Hi Vinay,
Please request access to upload to fasttrack.debian.net by opening a
salsa issue
Hello Team,
ruby-aws-sdk-kms (1.24.0-3~bpo11+1) is required for ruby-aws-sdk-s3 in
bullseye-backports-staging
Here is my fork [1]
Requesting sponsorship for ruby-aws-sdk-kms
Reason for sending RFS is, the package is ruby-aws-sdk-s3 is listed here
[2]
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/vinay
://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
directory,
please review it and requesting sponsorship for the same.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-oj
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 26/12/22 16:20, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On 24/12/22 11:37 PM, Vinay wrote:
Hello Team,
I have updated ruby-oj(3.13.23.1 -> 3.13.23.2 ) .The updated package
is available at [0].
The versions here are 3.13.23-1 -> 3.13.23-2
ruby-oj (3.13.23 ) is required for the new gem of git
On 25/12/22 13:30, Vinay wrote:
Quoting terceiro's reply here
"I think using a ruby version-specific path
is the right directory to use. You won't be able to build something
against nokogiri and use it with a given Ruby version before nokogiri
itself is available for that v
On 25/12/22 00:57, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hello Vinay,
On 12/24/22 00:09, Vinay wrote:
adding the header file in /usr/include solved the #include "oj.h"
problem.
execute_before_dh_auto_install:
for r in $$(ruby -rruby_debian_dev -e 'puts
RubyDebianDev::SUPPORTED_RUBY_VERSIO
header
files were required by oj-introspect.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-oj
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 23/12/22 17:07, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
Hi!
There was something like this required sometime ago from the nokogiri
package to build ruby-nokogumbo. You can have a look at commit
a3939406c9a1b7ef2d07942ea01d693057f50f47
in nokogiri git repo, dating from 2021-10-22.
I hope it helps at least a
1.
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 23/12/22 01:00, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hello Vinay,
On 12/22/22 23:54, Vinay wrote:
On 22/12/22 23:09, Vinay wrote:
Requesting access to push to this repositories.
Thank You (:
I've modified the permissions for you for these 3 packages in salsa.
You should be able to pus
On 22/12/22 23:09, Vinay wrote:
Hey Team,
I've updated ruby-fog-local,ruby-fogbugz to new upstream,but I
don't have maintainer access to push to this repo,
ruby-aws-sdk-s3 too :)
Requesting access to push to this repositories.
Thanks
Vinay
Hey Team,
I've updated ruby-fog-local,ruby-fogbugz to new upstream,but I
don't have maintainer access to push to this repo,
Requesting access to push to this repositories.
Thanks
Vinay
hanks
Vinay Keshava
aintainer access, but have pushed to my fork [0]
Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-oj is listed in
this issue
https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/-/issues/191 , so
it will help in packaging gitlab 15.3.0.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-oj
On 15/12/22 01:33, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hi Vinay,
On 12/15/22 06:24, Vinay wrote:
ruby-faraday latest upstream is uploaded to experimental, how to
mention an experimental package in d/control Build-Depends ?
Or should use sbuild with --extra-repository of experimental ?
Yes, you should
/autopkgtest-self/
E: No packages found
E: No packages found
I: no reverse (build) dependencies
Thanks
Vinay Keshava
low-redirects
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
it will help in packaging gitlab 15.5.1.
ruby-faraday breaks a list of packages and bug reports are also filed
for breaking packages
http://paste.debian.net/1262131/
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-faraday
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 19/11/22 19:27, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12 2022 at 10:50:53 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava
wrote:
Hello Team,
I have packaged ruby-ipaddr and ruby-cvss-suite
The package is available at [0] and [1]
Please review the packages and sponsor it.
Reason for sending an RFS
packaging gitlab 15.5.1.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-faraday-net-http
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
5.1.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-re2
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
it will help in packaging gitlab 15.5.1.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-ipaddr
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-cvss-suite
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
Hello,
Setting up https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta/-/blob/master/setup
fails on debian-sid (lxc container)
Anyone have any workaround for this issue?
Copying rootfs to /var/lib/lxc/autopkgtest-unstable-amd64/rootfs...ln:
failed to create symbolic link
'/var/lib/lxc/autopkgtest-unstable-
On 31/10/22 17:14, Vinay Keshava wrote:
Hello Team,
I have updated ruby-toml-rb (2.1.0 -> 2.2.0) and ruby-marginalia
(1.11.1 | 1.10.1) .The updated package is available at [0] and [1]
Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package is listed in this
issue
https://git.fosscommunity
On 31/10/22 19:22, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote:
Hi Vinay,
Thank you very much for helping out.
I have fixed the problem with the work on
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-version-gem.
Thank you very much for your work and your help.
Welcome (:
*From: *Vinay Keshava <mailto:vinayk
.1 (pre-receive
hook declined)
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-toml-rb
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-marginalia/
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 31/10/22 15:52, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote:
Hi Vinay,
Yeah I was having some issues regarding the implementation of the
changes Praveen asked, and the problem is that the package looked okay
when I pulled it to correct the errors Praveen mentioned, so I was
quiet confused.
I tried to get
On 31/10/22 15:31, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote:
Hi Vinay,
ruby-version-gem has already been packaged by me and is awaiting approval.
Hi Ajayi Olatunji O,
But the branch layout seems to wrong, there's only master branch
,pristine-tar and upstream branches are missing
and all the changes
/10/msg1.html
the package was already packaged but the branch layout seems to be wrong
[1] so the updated repo is here [0]
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-version-gem/
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-version-gem
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
packaging gitlab 15.4.0.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-elasticsearch-rails/
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-spamcheck/
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
ing gitlab 15.4.0.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-view-component
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 08/10/22 02:05, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 7 2022 at 10:46:14 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay
Keshava wrote:
Hello Team,
I have updated ruby-diffy (3.3.0 -> 3.4.2) .The updated package is
available at [0].
Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-diffy
4.0.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-diffy
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
in packaging gitlab 15.3.0.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-redis-actionpack/
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
3.0.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-oj/
Thank You
Vinay Keshava
On 24/08/22 00:56, Vinay Keshava wrote:
Hello Team,
updated ruby-truncato with changes available at
https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-truncato
Thank You
Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-truncato is
listed in this issue
https://git.fosscommunity.in
Hello Team,
updated ruby-truncato with changes available at
https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-truncato
Thank You
On 21/08/22 23:47, Vinay Keshava wrote:
Hello Team.
I have updated ruby-truncato (|0.7.11 -> ||0.7.12|) and
ruby-kubeclient (|4.9.2 -> ||4.9.3|). The u
Hello Team.
I have updated ruby-truncato (|0.7.11 -> ||0.7.12|) and ruby-kubeclient
(|4.9.2 -> ||4.9.3|). The updated package is available at [0] [1] .
The package is lintian clean and are building successfully
Requesting for Sponsorship.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshav
69 matches
Mail list logo
