Hi Matijs,
On 5 December 2015 at 12:38, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems none of the CRubies will build unpatched on current
> Debian Sid, even those from the 2.2 series (though I haven't checked all of
> them). It may make sense to at least provide the appropriate patches as p
Hi Adam,
On 5 December 2015 at 11:30, Adam Baxter wrote:
> zeha on #debian-ruby ended up doing this for me - looks like I was pretty
> close
great, thanks for the help!
Could you also make sure to update the manpage to document changes in
ruby-build, please? (It would be good to have an up-to-d
Hi Adam,
On 5 December 2015 at 02:54, Adam Baxter wrote:
> * It'd be nice to get a newer version into Debian
importing a newer version of ruby-build is mainly an issue of updating
the manpage. I have to admit that I don't use ruby-build too often
anymore. The Debian Ruby packages are fairly up-t
Hi,
On 1 May 2015 at 22:32, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> There is a small detail I neglected: for some reason, the rake command
> provided by the interpreter will prefer to use its version of minitest
> instead of the installed ruby-minitest package (which is contrary to our
> expectations, that in
Hi Cédric,
thanks for your feedback. Great suggestions.
On 1 May 2015 at 15:23, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> You could add a: Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby in the debian/control
> file, so that the test suite can be run against the installed package on
> the ci.debian.net continuous integration
Hi debian-ruby,
congratulations on a great release and thanks for all of the hard work that
went into jessie!
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
rub
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points
listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship
).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20141016-1
Thank you!
Sebastian
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20140926-1
Thank you!
Sebastian
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20140408
Thank you!
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi Cédric,
On 25 February 2014 18:33, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Maybe you wanted to remove also the line before the ones you added?
you're right of course. Fixed.
Best,
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20140224.1
(New upstream version including Ruby 2.1.1, manpage updated.)
Thank you
Sebastian
--
Hi,
On 3 March 2013 10:27, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Could you fix those too? Thanks!
sure, fixed.
Best,
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/
Hi Cédric,
On 3 March 2013 00:17, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Before uploading, could you address the issues reported by lintian? This
> is what I get with the version from experimental:
sorry about that, I still had the sid version of lintian installed,
which did of course not report any warning
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20130227-1
(New upstream version including Ruby 2.0.0-p0, manpage updated accordingly.)
Thank you
Hi Antonio,
On 13 November 2012 14:15, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> There was a minor problem with the manpage, wihch I fixed in commit
> a047104.
Great, thanks. Sorry, I had totally forgotten about the line breaks. I
should have caught that myself.
> BTW was that manpage already submitted upstrea
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20121104-1
(New upstream version including Ruby 2.0.0-preview1, manpage updated.)
Thank you!
Seba
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20120524-1
(New upstream version, manpage updated accordingly.)
Thank you!
Sebastian
--
To UNS
Hi,
The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points
listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor it?
ruby-build 20120423-1
Thank you!
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debia
Hi,
On 7 January 2012 01:14, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> The only thing I would change is moving rbenv-install from /usr/bin to
> /usr/lib/rbenv/libexec to avoid cluttering the $PATH. This way -- at
> least on my system -- rbe completes to `rbenv` immediately. I've
> committed this to the repositor
Hi,
On 16 December 2011 00:45, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I had reviewed the package before, but ended up not being able to send
> them to you before. These are the notes I took, but some of them overlap
> with Cedric's comments.
Thank you for your feedback.
I finally got around to addressing al
Hi Cédric,
On 14 December 2011 23:33, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> I have a few remarks/questions that may lead to improvements of your package
Thank you for your feedback. Apparently I should have been more clear
about the current status of my package: I simply pushed the contents
of my PPA's rep
Hi list,
I'm currently in the process of cleaning up my ruby-build package[1,
2] for inclusion in Debian.
Since I'm not currently a Debian maintainer, I would love to hear your
feedback on this packaging effort. Also, I'm looking for possible
sponsors, so if anybody wants to step in, please drop
22 matches
Mail list logo