Re: activeresource package

2014-10-01 Thread Sam Ruby
On 10/1/14 5:26 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, I noticed active resource is missing from the repo while looking at diaspora progressbar. https://people.debian.org/~praveen/diasbar/ I just asked boutil about it and he says this is a separate gem now in rails > 4. He asked me to post it here to do

Re: RFC: reverting ruby-rack to 1.4.x with an epoch

2013-10-26 Thread Sam Ruby
On 10/26/2013 07:34 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: On 10/26/2013 03:47 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3

Re: RFC: reverting ruby-rack to 1.4.x with an epoch

2013-10-26 Thread Sam Ruby
On 10/26/2013 03:47 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: What about temporarily introducing "rack1.4" package and use that as dependency in rails-3.2 (together with adding Breaks: rails-*-3.2 to rack 1.5) This is another idea, which could so

Re: installation path for rails templates

2013-07-02 Thread Sam Ruby
nfirm that both jbuilder and strong_parameters modify the controller template in quite different ways. Cédric - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/08/2013 10:25 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:28:23PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: I will be happy to replace my very simple Rails test which yours. Is there a way to run those tests without installing anything, so that I

Fwd: Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-06 Thread Sam Ruby
install of ruby-bcrypt doesn't make the bcrypt-ruby gem available. See http://paste.debian.net/8886/. The second problem is that mysql-server-5.5 isn't installable using the default configuration. See http://paste.debian.net/8887/. - Sam Ruby [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/05/2013 11:50 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:48:52AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/05/2013 12:31 AM, Praveen A wrote: We should add a package that runs at least these sequence of commands rails new foobar rake test when any of the dependencies for the default

Re: Rails 3.2 sessions broken with Rack 1.5

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
which will notify us when we break this loop. I have exactly such a package. :-) In fact, it is an official part of the Rails release process: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/RELEASING_RAILS.rdoc#is-sam-ruby-happy--if-not-make-him-happy When it fails, it sends me an IM (using XMPP

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/04/2013 03:43 PM, Praveen A wrote: 2013/6/4 Sam Ruby : Don't apply the previous patch. I can reproduce the above error with the following commands: rails new foobar cd foobar rails generate scaffold Product title rake db:migrate rake test Relevant line in testapp/test/test_help

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/04/2013 09:26 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Next thing on my list is rack, which also needs a new version. Do you have an opinion on rack as well? Currently, actionpack 3.2

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/04/2013 12:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/04/2013 12:19 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: 4) I haven't yet figured out how to run this. I keep getting errors about local changes. I'm now off to learn quilt. http://wiki.debian.org/Diaspora/Packaging/quilt I can now run with this patc

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/04/2013 12:19 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: 4) I haven't yet figured out how to run this. I keep getting errors about local changes. I'm now off to learn quilt. http://wiki.debian.org/Diaspora/Packaging/quilt I can now run with this patch, and get further. Next up: a series of erro

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
vironment" +Dir.chdir(TESTAPP_ROOT) { require "./config/environment" } require 'bourne' require 'shoulda-matchers' require 'rspec/rails' 4) I haven't yet figured out how to run this. I keep getting errors about local changes. I'm now o

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-03 Thread Sam Ruby
p://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Obtaining_the_master_repository But that one doesn't appear to have been updated today: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/.git;a=summary C. - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-03 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Sam, * Sam Ruby [130603 16:05]: On 06/03/2013 09:49 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Praveen, Sam, * Praveen A [130603 15:45]: 2013/6/3 Praveen A : I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't solve m

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-03 Thread Sam Ruby
Next thing on my list is rack, which also needs a new version. C. - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51aca279.4000...@intertwingly.net

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-03 Thread Sam Ruby
oulda-matchers depend on 'rails new testapp' working, I'm trying to see if that works before trying shoulda-matchers again. I presume that the next step is to upgrade the ruby-i18n package to 0.6.1? Is that something I can do or help with? - Sam Ruby On Jun 3, 2013 4:04 PM,

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-03 Thread Sam Ruby
try again. Getting further... Resolving dependencies... Could not find gem 'i18n (= 0.6.1) ruby', which is required by gem 'rails (=3.2.13) ruby', in any of the sources. $ gem list i18n *** LOCAL GEMS *** i18n (0.6.0) - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/02/2013 03:26 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: On 06/02/2013 01:04 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Sam, * Sam Ruby [130602 19:00]: On 06/02/2013 12:46 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: In fact, one doesn't even need shoulda-matchers at all to reproduce this error. The following command

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/02/2013 01:04 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Sam, * Sam Ruby [130602 19:00]: On 06/02/2013 12:46 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: In fact, one doesn't even need shoulda-matchers at all to reproduce this error. The following command also suffices: $ rails new foobar. Well -

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/02/2013 12:46 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: * Sam Ruby [130602 18:31]: From what I can see in the shoulda-matchers tests, the test application has a Gemfile.lock, which tries to pull in a version of "i18n" that is not in the Debian archive. For your tests to succeed, you&

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
ems-integration. And it makes sense to resolve that problem before determining how best to proceed with shoulda-matchers. - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/02/2013 11:16 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: * Sam Ruby [130602 16:34]: On 06/02/2013 08:34 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: [..] Therefore, the right place to focus is on getting a version of bundler which play's nice with Debian? I am not sure what you mean with that. How

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/02/2013 08:34 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Hi, * Sam Ruby [130602 13:43]: On 05/28/2013 02:27 PM, Praveen A wrote: Hi, I have been getting stuck trying to build many rails based gems, shoulda-matchers - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709431 [..] Offlist

Re: help with running tests for rails using gems

2013-06-02 Thread Sam Ruby
--- Where we go from here... Patching Rails to generate apps that don't, by default, use bundler will still require changes to shoulda_matchers. It furthermore will cause Rails to behave in ways different that it does in other environments. Therefore, the right place to focus is on ge

Re: tentative TODO list for getting Rails 3 on Wheezy

2012-06-22 Thread Sam Ruby
load. Anyone? I'm willing to RTFM if somebody can point me to one. I believe I have some relevant experience[1], have a number of idle machines, and while my O/S of choice has been Ubuntu for a number of years, that likely is close enough for me to be of at least some marginal value.

Re: RFH: ruby-rubymail 1.0.0-1

2012-06-06 Thread Sam Ruby
On 06/06/2012 02:56 PM, Per Andersson wrote: Hi! I am about to adopt librmail-ruby1.8 and porting it to the new Ruby policy thus creating ruby-rubymail. What name would be used for the 'mail' gem (which is used by rails, among others)? - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-05 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/05/2012 01:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 04/01/12 at 17:22 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded copies s

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
only. - Sam ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f04d135.5070...@intertwingly.net

Re: About apt-listbugs and ruby 1.9.x

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
the gem. I see that Sam Ruby has offered help: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/01/msg00012.html but he seems to be unable to reproduce the issue: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/01/msg00023.html I think that this may be explained by the fact that apt-listbugs currently forces the

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
in/tcsh to provide /bin/csh (csh) in auto mode. - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f046334.4030...@intertwingly.net

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
editions of my book against multiple versions of Rails running on multiple versions of Ruby: http://intertwingly.net/projects/dashboard.html If we can focus on a common future, I can help by running tests, providing patches upstream, and building packages. Lucas - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/04/2012 02:26 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/01/12 at 08:00 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: ruby-switch is not found using Ubuntu 11.10. Right. I try to keep track of what Ubuntu includes or not, but that's usually the first task to suffer when I'm too busy. A good way to do that i

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-03 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/03/2012 02:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 02/01/12 at 13:13 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: The Ruby team has indicated that they plan to stop providing bug support for Ruby 1.8.7 later this year, and to drop all support next year: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-02 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/02/2012 05:05 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, On 02/01/12 at 13:13 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: The Ruby team has indicated that they plan to stop providing bug support for Ruby 1.8.7 later this year, and to drop all support next year: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7

Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-02 Thread Sam Ruby
given that 12.04 is intended to be LTS release) to default to Ruby 1.9.3? - Sam Ruby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01f3c7.9070...@intertwingly.net