Re: Packages not in Testing and in danger of missing Bookworm (Jekyll and more)

... But there are other packages that would require pre-work as well: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&version=testing Maybe someone knows a way to extract the list of packages not in Testing, but in Unstable? In the past, release

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-signet

> I've updated ruby-signet to 0.17.0. I've verified the package is lintian > clean and reverse dependencies are building perfectly. I'm a DM, but I don't > have access to upload this updated package. This package is updated for > updating gitlab to 15.6.1 [1]. > ruby-signet -> ruby-googleauth ->

Re: oj.h not found

> There was something like this required sometime ago from the nokogiri > package to build ruby-nokogumbo. You can have a look at commit > a3939406c9a1b7ef2d07942ea01d693057f50f47 > in nokogiri git repo, dating from 2021-10-22. > I hope it helps at least a bit. > > I don't know if the solution is o

Re: oj.h not found

> I'm building oj-introspect(0.7.1) required for gitlab, but the build fails > due to missing header oj.h from ruby-oj. > It seems to be a upstream issue > https://github.com/meinac/oj-introspect/issues/4 It seems to be the user's local problem and not an upstream issue. You likely need to pack

Re: [RFS] ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection 1.0.1

I had uploaded your package to new. Thanks! -- Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [RFS] ruby-rack-attack 6.6.1

Quoting Anupa Ann Joseph (): > Hi, > > Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-rack-attack updated from version > 6.3.1 to 6.6.1. > > > The package is lintian clean and build in clean chroot in sbuild. > > Updated package is available at: > https://salsa.debian.org/aaj/ruby-rack-attack Uplo

Re: Speedbump while running tests for ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection

Hi again, On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41:57AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:55:41PM +0530, Abraham Raji wrote: > > > Are you building in a clean chroot? And can you push your package > > > somewhere? > > > (The pasted logs don't give m

Re: Speedbump while running tests for ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection

Hello, On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:55:41PM +0530, Abraham Raji wrote: > > Are you building in a clean chroot? And can you push your package somewhere? > > (The pasted logs don't give much clue) > I'm building in a sid container that I've created for packaging. I > haven't done much with the packag

Re: Speedbump while running tests for ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection

Quoting Abraham Raji: > I am trying to package ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection and I am able to > build the package successfully but while running the tests > I can see that the tests run as expected for ruby3.0 but for ruby3.1 it is > trying to fetch dependencies using bundler. I am unclear

Re: libruby2.7: separate rbconfig.rb for cross building

Hi Antonio / Ruby Team, You had a patch ready for this here[1] (before bullseye) or somewhere else, right? If possible could you make an upload? This would help ruby ext cross build, which would be pretty cool. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-defaults/-/tree/crossbuild On Mon, 15

Re: Request for Help: ruby-bio

Hi Daniel, Have you tried on a porter machine? Yes, and the result is same. However, on Praveen's suggestion, I changed from ruby-tests.rb -> ruby-tests.rake and now it worked just fine. So all good :) Nilesh OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Request for Help: ruby-bio

Hi, I had uploaded ruby-bio 2.0.2 (next patch release yesterday) It built fine both, on my machine and salsa CI as well[1] however, it has failures on buildd machines[2] I cannot reproduce the problem, and I'm unsure as to what triggers this could someone please have a look and let me know? [1]:

Re: Is there a way to specify test-only dependency for autodep8 tests?

> You want something like this: > $ cat debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-ruby.conf > ───┬─── >│ File: debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-ruby.conf > ───┼─── >1 │ extr

Is there a way to specify test-only dependency for autodep8 tests?

Hi, At present it looks like the autodep8 tests (which is run via gem2deb-test-runner) takes in the package, installs dependencies and runs the upstream tests as autopkgtests - great! However, is there a way to specify explicitly more test dependencies? For example, the package ruby-mini-portile2

Re: ruby-cssminify question

> Hi team, > only out of curiosity what happened to the > package I had a look at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ruby-cssminify > and found: > "action needed: > Multiarch hinter reports 1 issue(s)low > There are issues with the multiarch metadata for this > package. ruby-cssminify could be marked

[RFS] ruby-omniauth-github/

Hi, I have updated ruby-omniauth-github/ to 1.4.0 as required by gitlab, build+autopkgtests look fine. I have pushed my changes to team repo here[1]. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-omniauth-github Thanks and regards Nilesh

[RFS] ruby-erubi

Hi, I have updated erubi to version 1.9.0 as needed by gitlab, builds fine in a clean chroot+autopkgtests pass. I have pushed changes to team repo here[1]. Needs review and sponsorship [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-erubi Thanks and regards Nilesh

[RFS] ruby-grape-path-helpers

Hi I updated r uby-grace-path-helpers to version 1.2.0 as required by gitlab. It builds in a clean chroot with autopkgtets passing. I have pushed my changes here[1]. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-g

[RFS] ruby-task-list

Hi, I have updated ruby-task-list to version - 2.3.1 as required via gitlab. It builds fine in a clean chroot, and autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed the changes here[1]. Need Review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/ruby-task-list Thanks and regards Nilesh

[RFS] ruby-octokit

Hi I have updated ruby-octokit to version - 4.15.0 . It builds fine on a clean chroot, is lintian-clean and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changes here: [1]. This update is needed for gitlab. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/ruby-octokit Th