Re: New version of ruby-tilt breaks some packages

2019-12-15 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Utkarsh, On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 11:34 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > You could've avoided that trouble (at least some part of it) by using > the meta/build[1] script. The rebuild of the rdeps is really neat. I didn't know about this repo. Thanks a lot! :) Joseph

New version of ruby-tilt breaks some packages

2019-12-15 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi guys, I updated ruby-tilt yesterday and I see a few packages broken after that: * ruby-hamlit but it's an old version and testing with tilt 2.0.10 on the latest version works so if you're ok with it I'll update the package later today * ruby-slim: for this one it seems that the upstream tests

Moving a few default branches to debian/master for dep14

2019-12-01 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi guys, FYI I'm moving the default branches of the following packages I've worked on recently from master to debian/master and updating gbp.conf there after dropping the master branch, so please make sure to update your local branches if you plan to work on them: * asciidoctor * ruby-asciidoctor

Re: debugging "File does not exist: bundler/setup" under autopkgtest (was "Call for help!")

2019-08-26 Thread Joseph Herlant
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:32 AM Antonio Terceiro wrote: > It's probably a good idea, and will avoid having to do the same > workaround on every package that has a similar issue. Awesome, thanks for your reply. I created https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gem2deb/merge_requests/6 Joseph

Re: debugging "File does not exist: bundler/setup" under autopkgtest (was "Call for help!")

2019-08-23 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Antonio, Thanks for that awesome walk-though and findings! Where would you stand on having gem2deb-test-runner moving out the Gemfile.lock like it does with lib for autopkgtest mode? I don't see a lot of value in keeping the Gemfile.lock in an environment where the gems are system-packaged. (Ha

Re: Call for help!

2019-08-22 Thread Joseph Herlant
So I spent some time trying to debug the issue but came up empty. The load path are really similar: During the build: - LOAD_PATH - /<>/spec /<>/spec /<>/lib /<>/debian/ruby-arbre/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby . /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/did_you_mean-1.2.1/lib /usr/local/lib/sit

Re: Call for help!

2019-08-22 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Utkarsh, Looking at ruby arbre right now I'm able to reproduce your issue using gbp buildpackage --run-autopkgtest (with a fresh sbuild chroot for unstable). > Now, the packages using bundler and ruby-combustion, their autopkgtest > fails (build is perfectly fine!) saying: > "File does not exi

Upgrading a ruby package when the test suite has been removed from the gem file

2019-06-12 Thread Joseph Herlant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi guys, I'm preparing the lastest version of asciidoctor and am facing some issues. Upstream removed the test suite from the gem in https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/pull/3048 to reduce the size of the gem. So I switched the watch file to

Re: RFS: new version of asciidoctor (1.5.8-1) ready for review/upload

2018-11-28 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Cédric, On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:53 AM Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Uploaded, and tagged/pushed to salsa. Awesome, thanks a lot! :) > I meant use debhelper-compat in the debian/control boilerplate created > by gem2deb instead of the debian/compat file. And/or also update the > "debhelper-comp

Re: RFS: new version of asciidoctor (1.5.8-1) ready for review/upload

2018-11-27 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Cédric, Sorry for the late reply, I've been having crazy days lately. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:47 PM Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I don't have time and energy tonight to wait for all reverse > build/dependency to build. But if you agree we my proposition (or make a > new one), I am willing to

RFS: new version of asciidoctor (1.5.8-1) ready for review/upload

2018-11-22 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi guys, I've updated the asciidoctor package with the latest 1.5.8 version of asciidoctor. It fixes 2 bugs: #913892 which is a CVE and #909105 which currently blocks some packages like ndctl from being available on ia64 (see the last comments at the end of #909105). It is available in https://sa

Re: help with ruby-redis test failure

2018-10-11 Thread Joseph Herlant
Could it be due to the fact that you have sha1 certs? https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-redis/blob/master/test/support/ssl/trusted-cert.crt Not sure if it's still accepted with openssl 1.1. On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:28 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi, > > Can someone help with ruby-redis te

Re: RFS: new version of asciidoctor (1.5.7.1-1) ready for review/upload

2018-05-15 Thread Joseph Herlant
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Uploaded. Thanks! Awesome, thanks Cedric! :)

RFS: new version of asciidoctor (1.5.7.1-1) ready for review/upload

2018-05-13 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi guys, I've updated the asciidoctor package with the latest 1.5.7.1 version of asciidoctor. It is available in https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/asciidoctor Could you have a look when you have a moment to review the changes please? Thanks for your help, Joseph

Re: RFS: new version of asciidoctor ready for review/upload

2018-05-13 Thread Joseph Herlant
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Guillaume Grossetie wrote: > Just so you know, a new bug fix release release is available 1.5.7.1: > https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/releases/tag/v1.5.7.1 Good catch, thanks Guillaume. Packaging the new version right now. Joseph

Re: RFS: new version of asciidoctor ready for review/upload

2018-05-12 Thread Joseph Herlant
Awesome, thanks Antonio! :)

Re: RFS: new version of asciidoctor ready for review/upload

2018-05-06 Thread Joseph Herlant
I updated another patch to be able to push it upstream. The repo is now up-to-date. If you pulled the repo in the interval, could you pull again before reviewing please? Thanks for your help, Joseph On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:43 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'

RFS: new version of asciidoctor ready for review/upload

2018-05-05 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi guys, I've updated the asciidoctor package with the latest 1.5.7 release from 3 days ago. It is available in https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/asciidoctor Could you have a look when you have a moment to review the changes please? Thanks for your help, Joseph

RFS: asciidoctor - new version to fix FTBS

2018-04-13 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi, I've done a modification to fix the FTBS in asciidoctor. Could someone have a look at it please? https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/asciidoctor Thanks for your help Joseph

Re: RFS: ruby-tilt new version

2018-04-10 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Lucas, Thanks a lot for your review > After had a look in ruby-tilt a saw that upstream changed the years of > the copyright, you should update it in debian/copyright file. Updated in the repo. > Another minor issue: you could check dependencies during build in > debian/rules, you just need

RFS: ruby-tilt new version

2018-04-09 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi guys, I package ruby-tilt's latest version (mostly to fix some annoying warning I had on other applications that have been removed upstream about a year ago). Also fixed a few lintian complains and enabled the autopkgtests The new version is available in https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-

ruby-team: request access to the Salsa ruby team

2018-04-08 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi, I'd like to help maintaining the asciidoctor package so I've requested the access to the ruby-team on Salsa (sending this mail to give context to the request). Thanks for your help, Joseph