On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 09:20:22AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> You cannot get a bundled upstream tarball anywhere, so what's the point?
>
> Other points that make me think it would be easier to have a single
> rails source package:
>
> -
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > require "rubygems" is a redundant task unless this library is being built
> > for >1.9.3 and even if people don't consider it expensive (and it's not
> > expensive in the grand scheme of things) it's just not needed unless you
> > are on
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Praveen A
>
> > Should we comment out rubygems usage as a fallback option too?
>
> I don't think so, as long as the dependencies of the package pulls the
> library in, the code is never executed.
>
require "rubygems" is a redundant task
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:18:59PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> > Is it obvious that test-unit gem has
> > more priority than bundled gems? (may be this is a stupid questions I'm a
> > newbie to ruby).
>
> Any third-party library has priorit
Morning,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Praveen A wrote:
> 2013/1/23 Antonio Terceiro :
>> Please take some care to check it the packages you are creating are
>> actually needed as a dependency for a Debian package of the applications
>> you want to get into Debian!
>>
>> The `listen` gem, for
Morning.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 06:44:20PM +0100, James Healy wrote:
>> I've updated my github copy[1] of the team's MRI repo to the latest
>> release, 1.9.3p362.
>>
>> I'd love to see the latest MRI available in experimental during the
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> I failed to find where you proposed actual alternate valid solutions to
> the problems that the solutions you are critizing are addressing, sorry.
Keep reading. Everything in there is valid even if you don't consider
it valid, the least y
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Looking at the content of your mail, it seems obvious that you don't
> understand why this 'mess' is necessary. I suggest you dig into the list
> archives before telling us what to do.
Are we jumping off hinge, getting butt hurt and making a
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
>>> > It depends on the 'ruby compatibility version' for that release. Is it
>>> > 1.9.1 or something else?
>
> 1.9.3.
I also think th
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
>> > It depends on the 'ruby compatibility version' for that release. Is it
>> > 1.9.1 or something else?
1.9.3.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:10 PM, shawn wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 13:07 -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, shawn wrote:
>> > you should read the bug. rubygems->ruby1.8
>> > rubygems1.9.1->ruby1.9.1 (now provided: by ruby1.9.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:02 PM, shawn wrote:
> you should read the bug. rubygems->ruby1.8
> rubygems1.9.1->ruby1.9.1 (now provided: by ruby1.9.1(really 1.9.3))
Absolutely right, I missed that, looks like the rubygems depend needs
to be put directly onto ruby1.8 instead of on packages like hoe.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> shawn wrote:
>> rails3 on wheezy now also pulls in ruby1.8 through a stupid broken
>> dependency in ruby-hoe, which pulls in "rubygems" (patch available bug
>> #685330 -- how long should i wait before pushing to git and/or uploading
>> to mento
Hi
On 07/29/2012 06:58 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> I'm somewhat puzzled about this bug. The root cause of the problem
> appears to be that ruby-mysql doesn't support Ruby 1.9 string encodings,
> and it is abandoned upstream, so a quick fix from upstream isn't likely.
> Weirdest but possibly ea
On May 25, 2012 7:07 AM, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> You appear to be a little confused here. wheezy+1 will not be a
> point release, it will be the next major release after wheezy (it
> doesn't have a name yet, hence "wheezy+1").
Ah, well I take back my comments on point releases then. Thanks fo
On May 25, 2012 6:39 AM, "Antonio Terceiro" wrote:
>
> Hell Jordon,
>
> Jordon Bedwell escreveu isso aí:
> > On May 24, 2012 3:25 PM, "shawn" wrote:
> > > The Ruby 1.9 series brings massive speed improvements over the 1.8
> > > series due t
On May 24, 2012 3:25 PM, "shawn" wrote:
>
> The last release on the Ruby 1.8 series, 1.8.7, is scheduled for LTS
> starting June, and total EOL June 2013:
> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4996
Define LTS since it can mean plenty of things. To most 1.8 is about to hit
EOL just think of that year
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Praveen A wrote:
> This transition work has been going on for some time, I'm happy to see
> it ready. Ohai is not yet ported to ruby 1.9, so I'm building it for
> ruby 1.8 only. The two failing tests are reported upstream [1], if
> they fix it we can upload a new v
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I announced in the BTS that I would take care of the transition of
> ruby-opengl to gem2deb (#651702). I think I was a little bit too
> optimistic...
>
> I managed to solve #650605 in the repo, and did some of the work
> for the t
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Praveen A wrote:
> lib/ohai/plugins/ruby.rb has the following check to find rubygems.
> Does it need to be commented out?
>
> # Perform one more (conditional) query
> bin_dir = languages[:ruby][:bin_dir]
> ruby_bin = languages[:ruby][:ruby_bin]
> gem_binaries = [
>
On 10/25/2011 01:21 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> the fact that some parts of the stdlib are also released outside of the
> stdlib is really a pain.
The fact that some parts of stdlib are bundled into the Ruby package on
Debian when they are external is really a pain...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 08/30/2011 11:57 AM, Praveen A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to migrate ohai to gem2deb, it now requires yajl. When trying to
> build yajl-ruby I get following error.
>
> .../lib/yajl.rb:2:in 'require': no such file to load -- yajl/yajl
> (LoadError)
>from .../lib/yajl.rb:2
>from ./examp
Recently I decided to learn more Ruby, not wanting an unclean system and
being somebody who ultimately loves Debian because I can shape my system
how I want, even with apt packages, and not knowing anything about Ruby
I opted to learn from Debian by installing the Debian managed ruby1.9.1.
Plus I
23 matches
Mail list logo
