Re: Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

; > korundum > kross-interpreters > subversion At least subversion is due to ruby2.2 not including or depending on ruby-test-unit, even though upstream ruby's tarball does (#791925). Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#791844: subversion: FTBFS with ruby2.2: cannot load such file -- test/unit (LoadError)

d in the repository, but it's still being shipped as part of the official Ruby tarball. Why then is Debian's ruby package not providing the same? Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian

Re: Transition of Ruby packages to the new Ruby policy

gt; You receive this email because you are listed as the maintainer or > uploader of a Ruby package which has been detected as not using this new > policy. See the list of maintainers/packages at the end of this email. > … > James McCoy >vim (U) It's not clear to me from t