Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131209175925.gf35...@gwolf.org
Jonas Genannt dijo [Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:42:20PM +0100]:
> Hello,
>
> another update for ruby 1.8 removal. I have moved ruby-mp3info that is
> orphaned into Ruby
> pkg group:
> (...)
> Could any dd please have a look?
Hi Jonas,
One question before uploading: You are including some binary blo
Uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131203003006.gf124...@gwolf.org
Jonas Genannt dijo [Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:49:59PM +0100]:
> > Yes, I think we should upload as it is, as having it die on a
> > situation where Debian-packaged modules can work is clearly a bug.
>
> ok, it would be fine if you can upload it.
done!
(Thought you were a DD!)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Jonas Genannt dijo [Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:51:17PM +0100]:
> > I think they belong as Recommends, because (most of) the package is
> > usable without each of the dependencies.
>
> I have added to Recommends for ruby-barby:
> ruby-cairo, ruby-prawn, ruby-rmagick, ruby-chunky-png
>
> But dat
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:10:30AM -0600]:
> > > Note that I tried to make the example from polyglot's README run, but
> > > didn't manage: I got an uninitialized constant Hello (NameError).
> > > (same with the one in unstable before). Does i
Jonas Genannt dijo [Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:19:56PM +0100]:
> > Oh :( And it seems I botched this as well, as I uploaded barby as it
> > was. My main comparison was with the previous version, but it seems I
> > f*cked it up:
>
> it was already f*cked up. So bother me, I have forgotten to add this
Jonas Genannt dijo [Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:57:24PM +0100]:
> > > Could any dd please have a look?
> >
> > I've uploaded ruby-polyglot, ruby-rqrcode and ruby-ole.
> >
> > Note that I tried to make the example from polyglot's README run, but
> > didn't manage: I got an uninitialized constant Hello
Hleb Valoshka dijo [Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 02:35:18PM +0300]:
> As ruby-thread-safe at last entered archive we can upload new version
> of ruby-tzinfo. Thanks in advance.
Uploaded. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Polyglot pushed as well. Thanks for your work!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131202165329.gc121...@gwolf.org
Jonas Genannt dijo [Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 09:59:39PM +0100]:
> Hello,
>
> another package update for Ruby 1.8 removal, five on one rush.
>
> I have also removed transitional packages if ruby-foo was released with
> Wheezy. That will
> reduce the amount of binary packages.
>
> Could any dd please
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:54:02AM +0200]:
> This emails follows after the Ruby BoF at DebConf13, where the idea of
> organizing a Ruby sprint to focus on some particular tasks has emerged.
>
> As Debian France is organizing a Mini DebConf in January 2014 (certainly
> 18-19, d
Hi,
I finished Cédric's repackaging of libramaze-ruby into ruby-ramaze,
and the package now is policy-compliant and even looks
nice. However... I hit two walls.
First of all, it requires a *lot* of yet-unpackaged gems to run its
test suite. Of course, I minimized the tests only to the most basic
Hi lucas,
> With my new responsibilities, I've decided to strongly reduce my
> involvement in the Ruby team.
Congratulations on being Teh Chosen One. We will do our best to be a
project worth your leadership ;-)
> I'm happy that the Ruby team is in good health, and I fully trust the
> currently
Hi,
I don't recall we have worked out how to keep ourselves from getting
too much work updating our repositories once the freeze is over; at
some release in the past, I recall we (or was it the Perl team?) kept
the packages up to date, but uploaded only to Experimental.
Right now, according to P
Felix Geyer dijo [Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:50:42PM +0200]:
> Source: ruby-net-http-persistent
> Version: 2.7-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid, wheezy
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> This package requires internet connectivity for its test suite
> to pass. Package builds should not
Cédric Boutillier dijo:
> Hi!
>
> I've imported an upstream fix to the division by zero errors with
> Ruby1.9 in ruby-gruff, causing RC bug #676206.
> (...)
Hi,
I have just reviewed and uploaded Cédric's changes, fixing the RC bug
he mentions. I am attaching the full diff between the package
cur
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:20:55AM +0200]:
> > Can you create a branch off the tag corresponding to the version in the
> > archive and prepare a simpler upload with just the fix needed to fix the
> > RC bug? (remember to merge this branch into master afterwards).
>
> Thanks fo
ext1.3.2a-15
ii info2www
ii man2html
ii w3m 0.5.3-8
-- no debconf information
>From 5d55b5dfee0c1747c4e121c9893c8c2b2bd9d380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gunnar Wolf
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:06:26 -0500
Su
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:39:33AM -0300]:
> In your opinion, which one would require less effort?
>
> - porting dhelp to use OptionParser
> - porting ruby-commandline to 1.9
Both are half-done :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:10:38AM +0200]:
> I investigated a few days ago this problem, and found at least why it
> silently fails with Ruby1.9: with Ruby 1.9, private_instance_methods
> returns a list of symbols, not a list of strings, so the machinery to
> initialize the app
Hi,
CommandLine::Application has a very nice API and used to work quite
fine for me, but it is not 1.9.1-compatible (it even fails to fail -
#676125, #676248). The last release was in 2005, and it does not exist
in Gem form (which means, it's very unlikely Ruby people care about it
at all).
I rei
Adam D. Barratt dijo [Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:06:41PM +0100]:
> > (3) most of the packages that need fixing are leaf packages, or packages
> > for which the Ruby bindings can be easily disabled
>
> That's one way of getting rid of the bugs, yes. :-)
> (...)
Given you say this with a smiley -
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:55:48PM -0300]:
> Hi,
>
> libpdf-writer-ruby/ruby-pdf-writer have 3 RC bugs, very low popcon and
> no reverse dependencies. The code is not compatible with Ruby 1.9, and
> the upstream homepage says it is deprecated and unmaintained:
> http://ruby-pd
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:25:33AM +0200]:
> Hi!
>
> I've updated ruby-nokogiri repository to a newer version. It is lintian
> clean and builds fine with cowbuilder.
> Here is the changelog entry for this new version.
Uploaded.
Greetings,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Per Andersson dijo [Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 06:19:58PM +0200]:
> >> I have to
> >> leave quite soon, but will try to take a look at sup-mail, and if all
> >> goes well, I'll upload it as well.
> >
> > Nope - I built sup-mail, but as it is not a regular Ruby library and
> > it does not build with a tes
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:04:16PM -0500]:
> Hi,
>
> > ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1
> > ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1
> > ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1
> > ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1
> > sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
>
> I uploaded ruby-chronic, ruby-lo
Hi,
> ruby-chronic 0.6.7-1
> ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-1
> ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1
> ruby-trollop 1.16.2-1
> sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1
I uploaded ruby-chronic, ruby-lockfile and ruby-trollop. I have to
leave quite soon, but will try to take a look at sup-mail, and if all
goes well, I'll
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 07:41:06AM -0300]:
> I think that maybe we should send it to debian-devel-announce, since not
> everyone reads debian-devel.
>
> And we should probably ask the release team what they think before
> reaching to a wider audience. For example, they might su
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:25:42PM +0100]:
> Wheezy freeze will occur in about three months. Is there any action that
> has to be taken to encourage maintainers of Ruby packages outside of the
> team to convert their packages to the new Ruby policy (and possibly
> gem2deb when
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:26:27PM -0300]:
> Hello all,
>
> TL;DR: I would like to propose that we remove mongrel, mongrel-cluster and
> libgemplugin-ruby from the archive.
>
> These three packages are all abandoned upstream, are seriously broken,
> and the Ruby community does
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:25:22PM +0100]:
> Hi!
>
> At the BSP in Paris, I decided to look at the (very few) RC bugs of our
> team. The easiest not fixed seemed to be #654985. So I went ahead and
> pushed some changes in the repo. I just excluded some tests, and did
> some mi
Youhei SASAKI dijo [Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 03:48:28AM +0900]:
> > >
> > > It conflicts libnet-irc-ruby. I set Conflicts into debian/control.
> >
> > Please follow
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Renaming_existing_packages
> > since it replaces the other package.
>
> I know. Hmm...
>
Youhei SASAKI dijo [Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:12:06AM +0900]:
> Hi,
>
> I commit new upstream release about ruby-ole in team git repo.
> Please review and upload.
Uploaded.
Greetings (and thanks!),
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Praveen A dijo [Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:20:03PM +0530]:
> > Because it needs an amqp server to be running. Since it was running in
> > my system it passed all the tests. Now when I ran it after stopping
> > amqp-server all tests failed :(
> >
> > Form your log it is clear that amqp server was not s
Praveen A dijo [Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:35:57PM +0530]:
> > I think adding them as examples would be better than not providing any
> > documentation at all. I will update the package.
>
> I have created a new revision with this change (there is also a typo
> correction). Please upload the new revi
Praveen A dijo [Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:03:16PM +0530]:
> updated copyright file with all copyright terms for each file, please
> check and upload.
ruby-sigar uploaded.
> I really wish this was already included in devscripts/licensecheck
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472199
Hi,
Paul did a great job by migrating a package I had pending to do for a
long time, libhaml-ruby → ruby-haml. Now, this migration included a
deep split - Out of the original package, there is now a separate
ruby-sass... And the Emacs mode, haml-elisp, was dropped.
Nathan Weizenbaum, the upstream
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:19:21AM +0100]:
> Hi!
>
> I have converted ruby-prawn to gem2deb. I've pushed all branches/tags to
> the repository. The package is lintian clean (2 overrides for duplicate
> descriptions of transition packages), and builds fine in a clean chroot.
>
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:00:37AM +0200]:
> FYI.
> Ruby 2.0 for wheezy+1?
>
> Lucas
>
> - Forwarded message from Yusuke Endoh -
> (…)
> * Aug. 24 2012: big-feature freeze
> (…)
> * Oct. 24 2012: feature freeze
> (…)
> * Feb. 02 2013: 2.0 release
> (…)
Yay, that sou
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 01:18:34AM +0200]:
> I have finished the packaging of ruby-pdf-inspector, a build-dependency
> for ruby-prawn, needed for the transition to the new policy.
>
> The package is lintian clean, builds fine in a clean chroot. I
> successfully installed it an
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:59:07PM +0200]:
> Hi!
>
> Upstream just released a version with only change the fix of the faulty
> license header that made 0.10.0+real to be rejected from the archive.
> The only changes from the package Antonio reviewed is:
> - header or lib/pdf/r
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 01:50:58PM -0300]:
> > Yes, I find it very sensible. Of course, this could be part of the
> > gem2deb procedure, overridable in case is either not correctly
> > guessed, or in case there is more than one library. The ideal would be
> > to include every s
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:09:18PM +0200]:
> I've also tried to rebuild all packages maintained by pkg-ruby-extras
> (and using gem2deb) with that version with that version. The vast
> majority built fine (inc. test suites): the new failures are
> ruby-builder ruby-ole ruby-rspec-
Paul van Tilburg dijo [Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 09:37:07PM +0200]:
> (...)
> As you all know, not all gems ship tests or working tests. So some libs
> have tests disabled or no build-time test suite just yet.
> So, what if we put, by default, a very stupid syntax/load test in the
> generated debian-di
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:38:23AM +0200]:
> gwolf:
> - ruby-image-science: what's the status? (tagged, not in the archive)
Oh, thanks a lot!
I had uploaded it - but being it a package rename, I forgot to build
with -sa, and missed the REJECT.
Re-uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:04:19PM +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> I spent some time this morning trying to get a clean view of the git
> repos. I wrote a script (pkg-overview) that displays a huge table with
> everything. it's in git, as "pkg-overview". It's similar to what PET
> provides, ex
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:06:22PM +0200]:
> I've just submitted a Ruby BOF at debconf.
>
> I hope that many of you will be able to attend. Put differently: if you
> read this email, please apply for Debconf sponsorship! You don't need to
> be a DD or DM to be sponsored, and if y
Doh, I had too much backlog of this list's mail when I wrote my last
mail regarding rmagick :-P If I had seen it were actively worked
on...
Vincent Fourmond dijo [Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:58:01PM +0200]:
> >>> But for rmagick, it seems that the hooks only deal with documentation
> >>> building. Wou
Hi,
[ Explicitly Cc:ing the librmagick-ruby co-maintainers, but for
anybody who cares ]
I am repackaging RMagick from our old style to the Gem2deb one - And I
must say it was more painless that I expected! I am, however, not yet
uploading the new packages until you -who have worked more wit
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:25:41AM +0100]:
> > > But if i understand well, those circular dependencies will only last
> > > during migration to new policy ?
> >
> > I don't really trust Bill's opinion on this. I've just asked
> > debian-devel@.
>
> So, according to the feedback
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:45:11AM +0100]:
> (...)
> Regarding my involvement in this team, I will not fall in the trap of
> being the center point where most sponsorship requests go. I know that
> it's often very hard to find a sponsor inside Debian, and that sucks.
> But as a DD
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:01:57PM +0100]:
> > Run the test suite four times per package, once with each interpreter?
> > Well, of course it gives better coverage... But some test suites are
> > quite long to run. And if we reach a stage where the different
> > interpreters are co
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:27:22PM +0100]:
> > Heh, not the first time you push that way :)
> >
> > Still, I think the libfoo-ruby makes more sense when we are talking
> > about libraries. If an unexperienced user sees (picking a random
> > package of mine) a package called 'ruby
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:33:02PM +0100]:
> > How is the compatibility between implementations right now? If a
> > package works across interpreters (it should be human-tested! Maybe
> > running its test suite with the different available interpreters would
> > do, although I don
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:25:33AM +0100]:
> 5) Something I forgot to add is "dependencies on ruby interpreters".
> With gem2deb, we will get a single ruby-foo package that is supposed to
> work with all Ruby implementations (ruby1.8, ruby1.9.1, jruby,
> rubinius).
>
> I think th
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:49:24PM +0100]:
> Hi,
>
> After quite some work together with Antonio Terceiro, we now have a mostly
> working gem2deb implementation. It can handle everything needed to package
> ruby applications and libraries inside Debian, and is much better than th
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:23:40AM +0100]:
> > > But then, it would severely limit the possibilities for overrides, and
> > > we would end up basically reimplementing debhelper.
> > >
> >
> > I suppose it does get redundant with dh_installdocs. What if
> > dh-make-ruby just adde
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:42:44PM +0100]:
> Hi,
>
> So, apparently I needed the feeling that I didn't have to worry anymore with
> Ruby to get motivated again. I've spent some time today working on a
> replacement for our packaging scripts, using dh7, and I made good progress.
>
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:05:07PM +0100]:
> Well, the part of setup.rb that we are interested in is rather small.
> And setup.rb has lots of things that we don't need, like hook support,
> and support for ancient versions of Ruby.
>
> Also, there are some things that we surely w
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:11:54AM +0100]:
> >libsetup-ruby (U)
> >ncurses-ruby (U)
Adding myself as an uploader to both in SVN.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
Hi,
I am still in.
As for the packages for which I am listed as {,co}maintainer,
I'm interested in keeping them:
>libbarby-ruby
>libcolor-tools-ruby
>libevent-loop-ruby
>libgettext-activerecord-ruby
>libgettext-rails-ruby
>libgpgme-ruby
>libhaml-ruby
>libimage-sci
Roberto C. Sánchez dijo [Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:10:27PM -0500]:
> Lucas,
>
> Unfortunately, I only have time to maintain the packages for which I am
> already an uploader, but I do wish to remain a part of the team. My
> Alioth login is roberto.
Roberto, and should all of the packages listed fo
Marc Dequènes (Duck) dijo [Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:05:23PM +0200]:
> Coin,
>
> The Rails split finaly happened, but as Gunnar Wolf underlined, the
> gettext translations are now split too and a new package is necessary.
> Gunnar opened an ITP (#580697), but still nobody seems t
kling - Tell me any pressing points that are blocking a release,
and I will gladly work on them.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
he system, of course, to know when upstream has reached a
"good" point.
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010041622.gc6...@gwolf.org
related tools.
+Message-ID: <8c338b42-c662-49e3-99cb-f0b2c4026...@opscode.com>
+
+ -- Gunnar Wolf Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:01:09 -0500
+
merb (1.0.12+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Add merb-param-protection package.
Of course, this illegal changelog entry should be removed when
needed. Do
is shipped with Rails 2.1.x, while our
testing/unstable versions carry 2.2.x (and will probably soon be
upgraded to 2.3.x).
Greetings,
¹
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=rails
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0
et you and be able to
discuss and work this over - Do you plan on attending DebConf at New
York? The high bandwidth of a room we are physically located might
help us quite a bit.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
t version" is most probably not API-compatible.
…So, yes, I fully back Lucas' reasoning on this aspect.
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
gation to.
There can never be an obligation to do anything in Debian ;-) But we
can at least push this as, if you may, a strong recommendation or
position statement. Yes, not all of my packages are 1.9 enabled, and
for some it might be a not-to-hard task. But I have found it is
usually a
iod, we should strive to support it and have
the maximum possible number of modules ready for it. Otherwise, we
should just stick to 1.9.1.
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
yet another?) ${prefered_drink}, to be paid in New York
next year.
Good job!
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
pt-get-and-gems-different-planets-right-it-must-not-be-war-worlds
http://gwolf.org/blog/ruby-has-distribution-problem
http://gwolf.org/debian%20rails
² http://gwolf.org/blog/debgem-its-way
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ments - although separating
them in mailboxes will be easier.
Greetings!
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
in _my_
copy of the lists from pkg-ruby-extras-blah to the human one because,
as you say, users might write directly to it. But for _archival_ and
discussion purposes, it's best.
--
Gunnar Wolf ⢠gw...@gwolf.org ⢠(+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
gger teams.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > +1
>
> +3
*1.3055
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ryan Niebur dijo [Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:20:27PM -0700]:
> could somebody please sponsor this?
Done!
--
Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
but libxxx-ruby is much more
widespread nowadays.
And I'd add that existing packages should be homogeneized as much as
possible, even if it means going again through NEW.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerpri
to do the naming
switch if one is to happen, if for nothing else, to keep users from
having two naming variations to search on.
Thanks,
--
Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
pgpOghFGusvZj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
80 matches
Mail list logo
