Bug#1101902: ruby-cleanroom: Should ruby-cleanroom be removed from unstable?

2025-04-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: ruby-cleanroom Version: 1.0.0-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: grab attention of maintainer X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers , Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com>, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org, 1092...@bugs.debian.org, Package Salvaging Team Dear maintainer, I suggest rem

Re: Test suite issues in ruby-appraisal due to the attempt to access online resources

2024-11-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lucas, Am Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 07:22:29PM -0300 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: > I asked for its removal here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1087665 > > Thanks for raising this! Thank you for doing so Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Test suite issues in ruby-appraisal due to the attempt to access online resources

2024-11-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Thanks Hi, the package ruby-appraisal was a candidate for the Bug of the Day[1] and so I had a look. I updated the packaging Git to latest upstream and recent packaging standards. Unfortunately the test suite that runs after the install process fails as you can see in S

Re: ruby-bio FTBFS with ruby 2.5

2018-07-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd love to fix this bug since this package is of relevance for Debian Med. It seems to boil down to Error: test_na_seqstat(Bio::TestShellPluginSeq): ArgumentError: incomplete format specifier; use %% (double %) instead which sounds pretty easy for somebody who speaks Ruby (which is not

Re: Bug#733110: wordnet: Please migrate to Ruby 2.0/1.9

2014-01-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Dmitry E. Oboukhov has injected some Ruby 1.8 code into the wordnet packaging. I personally do not speak Ruby and thus can not fix the problem in an other way than simply droping the goldendict-wordnet binary package (its data package is created in this way). Since Dmitry has not (yet) respo

Re: Bug#676114: Ruby help needed (Was: Bug#676114: wordnet: FTBFS: debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII))

2012-06-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Sounds like you made a mistake, I'm afraid. :-( My barrier to revert this mistake is low. If there is no simple solution in three days (OK, I'll be offline weekend+Monday - so there is some additional delay) - I'll kick the binary

Re: Ruby help needed (Was: Bug#676114: wordnet: FTBFS: debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII))

2012-06-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sam, On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:26:42AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/05/2012 10:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >>>debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII) > >>>debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII) > >

Ruby help needed (Was: Bug#676114: wordnet: FTBFS: debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII))

2012-06-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Dmitry E. Oboukhov has added some Ruby code to wordnet packaging (debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb) which worked for two years and at least up to "Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:45:40 +0200" when I did the last upload. Yesterday I wanted to try to fix two (unrelated) open bugs and realised the FTBFS problem