Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 08:29:54PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Thanks for everything you have done, and I wish you a good recovery.
Thank you. I will work when I'm feeling good.
> I don't think you need to immediately remove them, let them become
> actual problems first?
Currently, t
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:14:27AM +0900, d...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I stepped down below packages uploader for personal reasons (health issues):
Thanks for everything you have done, and I wish you a good recovery.
> * itamae
> * ruby-formatador
> * ruby-gnome
> * ruby-guard
> * ruby-
Hi,
I have been looking at the gem dependency failure with nanoc
https://people.debian.org/~boutil/ruby3.3/mass-rebuild/builds/10/nanoc/nanoc_4.13.0-1+rebuild1724942411_amd64-2024-08-29T14:40:12Z.build
nanoc-core.gemspec asks base64 ~> 0.2
ruby3.1 ships base64 v 0.1.1
ruby3.3 ships base64 v 0.2.
On Sun Aug 25, 2024 at 10:28 PM CEST, Ananthu C V wrote:
> - ruby-bootsnap [3]
> - ruby-beaneater [4]
I've just uploaded the last two. Could you make sure that you forward
your minitest patch for ruby-beaneater to upstream? As it is not
Debian-specific, it could be useful for others.
Thanks for yo
Hi team,
with the help of Lucas, I ran a few more times the mass rebuild scripts
for some packages of the list
https://people.debian.org/~boutil/ruby3.3/mass-rebuild/builds/
We are down to 243 failures.
I am continuing to investigate failure patterns. One of them is the easy
MiniTest which shoul
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 01:53:13PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> I have interest to maintain ruby-gnome.
> Please add me to Uploaders.
Thank you. I added you to Uploaders.
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gnome/-/commit/a01f558e70095a692af989a8eb4d681c9cfd9451
--
Regards,
da
6 matches
Mail list logo
