Hey,
Thanks for all your work in the past weeks but all (or at least most)
of your emails are missing an important aspect of the RFS mail: the
main intent behind the work. For instance, you say package X is
updated and is lintian clean so here's an RFS, but WHY was this
package X updated in the fi
Hi,
The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor them?
ruby-fog-aws 3.14.0 (it is at
https://salsa.debian.org/ravi1/ruby-fog-aws)
Thank you!
--
Ravi Dwiv
Hey,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 1:06 AM Gabriela Pivetta wrote:
> I've pushed the changes to its salsa repo:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails
>
> Please consider to review and upload it.
Thank you, uploaded! \o/
- u
Hi,
I prepared an update of rails to 6.1.6.1+dfsg to fix: CVE-2022-22577,
CVE-2022-2, CVE-2022-32224.
I've pushed the changes to its salsa repo:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails
Please consider to review and upload it.
Regards,
Gabriela Pivetta.
Hey,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 1:00 AM Gabriela Pivetta wrote:
> I've pushed the changes to its salsa repo:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-selenium-webdriver
>
> Please consider to review and upload it.
Uploaded, thanks for your help! \o/
- u
Hi,
I prepared an update of ruby-selenium-webdriver from 4.0.3 to 4.4.0 as
required for rails update to 6.1.6.1+dfsg to fix: CVE-2022-22577,
CVE-2022-2, CVE-2022-32224.
I've pushed the changes to its salsa repo:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-selenium-webdriver
Please consider to re
Hello Team,
updated ruby-truncato with changes available at
https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-truncato
Thank You
On 21/08/22 23:47, Vinay Keshava wrote:
Hello Team.
I have updated ruby-truncato (|0.7.11 -> ||0.7.12|) and
ruby-kubeclient (|4.9.2 -> ||4.9.3|). The updated package
7 matches
Mail list logo