Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?

2020-04-12 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi Daniel, all, On 20-04-13 01:03:47, Daniel Leidert wrote: > What are your thoughts? Sounds reasonable, and good! Thanks, cheers, Georg

Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?

2020-04-12 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi there, the libruby2.x packages ship special versions of some gems. Also in Ruby 2.7 parts were split out into gems and we already packaged them separately. So the gem is available from libruby2.7 and ruby-. But libruby actually provides at least a version of the gem and might in some cases be s

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems

2020-04-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:25 am, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:41:37PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 7:58:34 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:05:42PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 12:28:52 AM I