Re: RFS: ruby-net-http-persistent

2020-03-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, മാർച്ച് 14 10:00:26 AM IST, Samyak Jain wrote: >Hey, > >For the ruby-faraday to be uploaded to unstable for v1.0.0. We need to >upload ruby-net-http-persistent to unstable. bundler autopkgtest was failing earlier. Happy to see it working now. I'll upload it. >The changelog entry has

AW:Help with fixing jekyll (wrt src:node-webpack)

2020-03-13 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi there,I reported the build issue against webpack and the bug was closed just a few hours ago. Is this happening with the "fixed" webpack package?Regards, Daniel Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Utkarsh Gupta Datum: Sa., 14. März 2020, 00:03An: debian-ruby , pkg-_javascript_-de...@ali

Re: RFS: ruby-concord

2020-03-13 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi, On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:23 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Consider to review and upload it. > > Uploaded and pushed to ruby-team on salsa. I don't think mentioning it > is a dependency of gitlab in description is useful (it is useful in an > itp), so removed it. The extended description is s

Help with fixing jekyll (wrt src:node-webpack)

2020-03-13 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi there, Currently, Jekyll doesn't build. Here's why: This commit[1] introduced using webpack. However this command: ``` cd debian/node_modules/livereload-js; webpack --entry ./lib/startup.js \ --output ../../../lib/jekyll/commands/serve/livereload_assets/livereload.js; cd - ``` fails t

RFS: ruby-net-http-persistent

2020-03-13 Thread Samyak Jain
Hey, For the ruby-faraday to be uploaded to unstable for v1.0.0. We need to upload ruby-net-http-persistent to unstable. The changelog entry has been pushed to the team[1]. The following dependencies and reverse dependencies; bundler autopkgtest [09:12:46]: test bundle-bin-path: - - - - - - - -

Re: MoM of (first) virtual meeting

2020-03-13 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Samstag, den 14.03.2020, 00:33 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > > Thank you to everyone who joined! > And to those who couldn't, we look forward to seeing you in the next one! :) Hopefully I'll join next time. The situation here and a conference I attended took most of my time. So I hadn't been

Re: RFC: RM requests for ruby-upr, ruby-multipart-parser, and ruby-haml-contrib

2020-03-13 Thread David Suarez
El vie., 13 mar. 2020 20:22, Lucas Kanashiro escribió: > Hi David, > > On 13/03/2020 14:54, David Suarez wrote: > > Im lost here... > > > > One of the decisions of removing, for example all the functionality of > > aws-sdk-v{1,2} in favor of having only aws-sdk-s3, is because ruby > > team is pac

RFS: ruby-simple-po-parser

2020-03-13 Thread kiran
Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-simple-po-parser. It is lintian clean and tested with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-simple-po-parser also like to add it to: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-s

Re: RFC: RM requests for ruby-upr, ruby-multipart-parser, and ruby-haml-contrib

2020-03-13 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi David, On 13/03/2020 14:54, David Suarez wrote: > Im lost here... > > One of the decisions of removing, for example all the functionality of > aws-sdk-v{1,2} in favor of having only aws-sdk-s3, is because ruby > team is packaging gems for ruby webapps, not for endusers (as utkarsh > commented s

Re: RFS: ruby-concord

2020-03-13 Thread Kiran Skunjumon
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:23 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:33 pm, ki...@disroot.org wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I prepared the packaging of ruby-concord. It is lintian clean and > > tested with sbuild. Further > > information about this package can be accessed from the URL :

MoM of (first) virtual meeting

2020-03-13 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi everyone, Thank you to everyone who joined! And to those who couldn't, we look forward to seeing you in the next one! :) We had a pretty nice (& a quick) meeting. Here are the logs: Minutes: http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ruby/2020/debian-ruby.2020-03-13-16.35.html Minutes (text): http://m

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (second try)

2020-03-13 Thread David Suarez
El vie., 13 mar. 2020 19:40, David Suarez escribió: > > > El vie., 13 mar. 2020 19:32, Antonio Terceiro > escribió: > >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 06:47:12PM +0100, David Suárez wrote: >> > El vie., 13 mar. 2020 18:30, Pirate Praveen >> > escribió: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 a

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (second try)

2020-03-13 Thread David Suarez
El vie., 13 mar. 2020 19:32, Antonio Terceiro escribió: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 06:47:12PM +0100, David Suárez wrote: > > El vie., 13 mar. 2020 18:30, Pirate Praveen > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 pm, Cédric Boutillier > > > wrote: > > > > Dear David, > > >

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (second try)

2020-03-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 06:47:12PM +0100, David Suárez wrote: > El vie., 13 mar. 2020 18:30, Pirate Praveen > escribió: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 pm, Cédric Boutillier > > wrote: > > > Dear David, > > > > > > I am re-reading your mail > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/CAJg5+Z2

Re: RFC: RM requests for ruby-upr, ruby-multipart-parser, and ruby-haml-contrib

2020-03-13 Thread David Suarez
Im lost here... One of the decisions of removing, for example all the functionality of aws-sdk-v{1,2} in favor of having only aws-sdk-s3, is because ruby team is packaging gems for ruby webapps, not for endusers (as utkarsh commented some time ago in is favor) Have ruby team any politics about wh

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (second try)

2020-03-13 Thread David Suarez
El vie., 13 mar. 2020 18:30, Pirate Praveen escribió: > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 pm, Cédric Boutillier > wrote: > > Dear David, > > > > I am re-reading your mail > > > https://lists.debian.org/CAJg5+Z2th-FNAxLNHb9+xkRz6O1RKb0RFxGCJ=yHOFSw2F38=w...@mail.gmail.com > > about the status of

Re: RFC: RM requests for ruby-upr, ruby-multipart-parser, and ruby-haml-contrib

2020-03-13 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hey Daniel, Thanks for identifying those packages but as we discussed today in our IRC meeting we will not remove packages that are not actually broken, even if they are old and not maintained upstream. So please, let's not remove those packages. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (second try)

2020-03-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 pm, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Dear David, I am re-reading your mail https://lists.debian.org/CAJg5+Z2th-FNAxLNHb9+xkRz6O1RKb0RFxGCJ=yHOFSw2F38=w...@mail.gmail.com about the status of the various versions of ruby-aws-sdk. As I understand the situation now: - the

Re: Reminder for virtual meeting #1 \o/

2020-03-13 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi everyone, On Thu, 12 Mar, 2020, 2:26 AM Utkarsh Gupta, wrote: > So the results of both the poll bring us to the conclusion that.. > > The meeting would be held on Friday, 13th March 2020 (consensus at > [1]) and the time slot would be 1730 to 1830 CET / 1330 to 1430 BRT / > 2200 to 2300 IST (

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems

2020-03-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:41:37PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 7:58:34 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:05:42PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 12:28:52 AM IST, Kiran Skunjumon > > wrote: > >> >their is two gem pars

Candidates for removal due to Ruby 2.7 transition

2020-03-13 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi team, I've been checking some packages which are still failing to build against Ruby 2.7 and I am considering to ask for removal for two of them: src:sup-mail [1] and src:ruby-session [2]. AFAICT they don't have reverse dependencies and upstream is dead. If someone wants to take care of them p

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems

2020-03-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 7:58:34 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:05:42PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 12:28:52 AM IST, Kiran Skunjumon > wrote: >> >their is two gem parser and ruby_parser. >> >In debian ruby_parser is packaged under ruby-parser ins

Re: RFS: ruby-concord

2020-03-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:33 pm, ki...@disroot.org wrote: Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-concord. It is lintian clean and tested with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-concord also like to add it