Re: RFS: ruby-adamantium

Hi Kiran, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:45 PM wrote: > both things are done > can u review it Uploaded with a minor fix. Check the last commit. And thanks for your quick fix! Best, Utkarsh --- ML Guidelines: http://www.shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/presentations/mailing-list-etiquette.pdf

Re: RFS: ruby-abstract-type

Hi Praveen, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:44 AM Pirate Praveen wrote: >> I think new packages have an exception on this one. > No exceptions, a source only upload is required to migrate to testing. For > tests, it requires at least devtools from git repo, probably more, so I > suggested to disable

RFS: ruby-concord

Hi, I prepared the packaging of ruby-concord. It is lintian clean and tested with sbuild. Further information about this package can be accessed from the URL : https://salsa.debian.org/hacksk-guest/ruby-concord also like to add it to: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-concord Consider t

Re: RFS: ruby-adamantium

March 10, 2020 11:43 AM, "Utkarsh Gupta" wrote: > Hi Kiran, > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:03 AM wrote: > >> Consider to review and upload it. > > The extended description is too short. Could you please add a bit more > of an explanation to it? > Additionally, run `cme fix dpkg` and commit the