Re: [RFS]ruby-get-process-mem[0.2.5]

2020-01-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Abhijith, On Sun, 12 Jan, 2020, 12:35 PM abhijith sheheer, wrote: > Hi, > ruby-get-process-mem have been updated to latest upstream 0.2.5 and builds > in clean chroot. > When you say "build", you mean sbuild or meta/build? In any case, could you run meta/build (if not done yet) and check fo

Re: [RFS]ruby-pg[1.2.1]

2020-01-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Abhijith, On Sun, 12 Jan, 2020, 12:36 PM abhijith sheheer, wrote: > Thanks Utkarsh. > Should we update the ruby-team/ruby-pg with my commits? > I already have :) Best, Utkarsh >

[RFS]ruby-get-process-mem[0.2.5]

2020-01-11 Thread abhijith sheheer
Hi, ruby-get-process-mem have been updated to latest upstream 0.2.5 and builds in clean chroot. Link: https://salsa.debian.org/abspython-guest/ruby-get-process-mem/ Needs review and sponsorship. Thanks in advance. Regards, Abhijith Sheheer

Re: ruby-aws-sdk_2.11.422-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-01-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജനുവരി 12 1:53:56 AM IST, "David Suárez" wrote: >Could you try again?. The upload goes now for experimental until >duplicates packages of v3 of this same gem gets ROM. > >I will request ROM for: > > - ruby-aws-sdk-s3 > - ruby-aws-sdk-core > - ruby-aws-sdk-kms > >The motive is,

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk

2020-01-11 Thread David Suárez
On 11/1/20 21:09, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ശ, Jan 11, 2020 at 20:46, David Suárez wrote: Well, if you applies this, I dunno why the upload were blocked until upstream CI of gitlab. If gitlab is in experimental, I dunno why it should block any unstable (working and well done packaging) upl

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk

2020-01-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശ, Jan 11, 2020 at 20:46, David Suárez wrote: Well, if you applies this, I dunno why the upload were blocked until upstream CI of gitlab. If gitlab is in experimental, I dunno why it should block any unstable (working and well done packaging) upload. Because we actually run the upstrea

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk

2020-01-11 Thread David Suárez
Hi, On 11/1/20 20:29, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ശ, Jan 11, 2020 at 19:53, David Suárez wrote: Hi, Any update here? Utkarsh was looking at the upstream ci and possibility of fixing the upstream tests. But I have uploaded it now. So now, we have two broken packages:  - ruby-aws-sdk (exp

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk

2020-01-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശ, Jan 11, 2020 at 19:53, David Suárez wrote: Hi, Any update here? Utkarsh was looking at the upstream ci and possibility of fixing the upstream tests. But I have uploaded it now. So now, we have two broken packages: - ruby-aws-sdk (experimental version): broken to enduser who wa

No package providing ruby-interpreter - debcheck complaints

2020-01-11 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi, debcheck complains for (probably all) Ruby packages about the fact that ruby- interpreter cannot be satisfied on any architecture. It seems that jruby used to provide ruby-interpreter up to version 1.7.26-1 (oldstable). Should this be dropped from the gem2deb templates and then (via the usual