Hi everybody,
after fixing the autopkgtest issue for jekyll there is one last issue
preventing a clean build on salsa.d.o. The pipeline always fails the reprotest
job because the second run always fails the tests in test/test_utils.rb in
lines 349, 368, 374. The result order of Dir.glob() and Util
Hi team,
First of all, happy new year!
As some of you might know we started to work on Ruby 2.7 in the end of
the last year, and we already have ruby2.7 source package available in
experimental and I am uploading it to unstable today (in experimental
both interpreters are enabled by default and i
On ബു, Jan 8, 2020 at 01:05, Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
The MR has been created upstream. Link here[1].
NOTE: If this pans out the way it should, we'd need to update
ruby-parallel, too.
Thanks Utkarsh, some tests failed.
https://gitlab.com/utkarsh2102/gitlab/-/jobs/396211773
This could be a si
On ബു, Jan 8, 2020 at 01:16, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
ruby-aws-sdk 2 -> 3 is huge change.
It adds 220 new dependencies for example.
https://rubygems.org/gems/aws-sdk-resources
On ചൊ, Jan 7, 2020 at 20:41, David Suárez
wrote:
I mean, that it not breaks nothing, not for it was in experimental if
not for the version supported in gitlab.
From gitlab GemFile:
''gem 'aws-sdk''
Gitlab dit not provides any version, so I think we can bump aws-sdk
to v3 too.
ruby-aws
On 6/1/20 20:25, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On തി, Jan 6, 2020 at 20:12, David Suárez wrote:
Hi,
Just updated the packaged in salsa.
It gets a new major version (1 -> 2), so they are not compatible. The
unique reverse dependency is gitlab (but in experimental version). So
it's should not br
Hi David, Praveen,
On 07/01/20 12:55 am, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On തി, Jan 6, 2020 at 20:12, David Suárez wrote:
>> Just updated the packaged in salsa.
>>
>> It gets a new major version (1 -> 2), so they are not compatible. The
>> unique reverse dependency is gitlab (but in experimental version)
Hello!
Please let me know if this is not the right place to post/discuss
something like this. This is not an issue with `rubygems-bundler` or any
other debian package. I would just like to understand better and get
feedback on what's the best way the proceed in situations like the one I
will
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 04:23:21AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Am Montag, den 06.01.2020, 22:17 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
>
> [..]
> > FWIW I uploaded gem2deb 1.0.1 earlier today fixing the issue.
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
> Unfortunately there is still an i
9 matches
Mail list logo
