Re: RFS: ruby-cucumber-expressions 5.0.13-1

On 04/05/2018 05:00 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > The package looks good and builds fine. > Could you please just not install the file README.md as docs, but > instead maybe examples.txt? > > I forcibly removed the debian/5.0.13-1 tag on salsa, as the package was > not accepted yet. Please ensure

Re: ruby 2.5.1 orig tarball differs from upstream

Hi Georg, On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 18:34 +0200, Georg Faerber wrote: > > On 18-04-06 17:14:57, John Leach wrote: > > I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1 > > e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual > > upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball > > (93fafd57a724

Re: ruby 2.5.1 orig tarball differs from upstream

Hi John, On 18-04-06 17:14:57, John Leach wrote: > I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1 > e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual > upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball > (93fafd57a724974b951957c522cdc4478a6bdc2e) > > The only difference is some gems re

ruby 2.5.1 orig tarball differs from upstream

Hi, I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1 e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball (93fafd57a724974b951957c522cdc4478a6bdc2e) The only difference is some gems removed from the Debian tarball: $ diff -ur upstream-orig/

Re: build-and-upload: autopkgtest fails

Hi all, I'm not sure if I'm on the right track here, but: - Using a stretch container, AUTOPKGTEST_NORMAL_USER is set to 'nobody'. - Using a unstable container, AUTOPKGTEST_NORMAL_USER is set to 'systemd-coredump'. That is the default, without setting -u/--user explicitly. root@autopkgtest-si

Re: build-and-upload: autopkgtest fails

Hi all, Some more findings: $ /usr/bin/autopkgtest -d -u debci /home/georg/code/debian/ruby-team/build-area/ruby-sequel_5.7.0-1.dsc -- lxc --sudo autopkgtest-sid 11:32 autopkgtest: DBG: autopkgtest options: Namespace(add_