Re: Bug#813237: transition: ruby2.3

2016-02-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
(only for the Ruby team) On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:47:03PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Nice people of the Ruby team: we will now start to see a few FTBFS > issues. I have been doing test rebuilds, and a list of packages that > currenly fail can be seen at the following address: > > https:

Re: Bug#813237: transition: ruby2.3

2016-02-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:44:52PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 24/02/16 11:38, Antonio Terceiro wrote: [...] > > I would like to add support for building for ruby2.3 in unstable. That > > means uploading the version of ruby-defaults in experimental

Re: RFS: ruby-hamster 3.0.0-1

2016-02-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Hanno Zulla wrote: > Hi, > > ruby-hamster has been updated upstream and a Debian package 3.0.0-1 is > imho ready to upload. > > Could you please sponsor it? you forgot to push the pristine-tar branch signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: ruby-hamster 3.0.0-1

2016-02-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:25:15PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:21:42PM +0100, Hanno Zulla wrote: > > Hi, > > > > ruby-hamster has been updated upstream and a Debian package 3.0.0-1 is > > imho ready to upload. > > > > Could you please sponsor it? > > you forgot to