Re: RFS: ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1

2016-01-25 Thread Michael Crusoe
Got it, thanks! Lun, 25 ian. 2016, 23:56, Christian Hofstaedtler a scris: > * Michael Crusoe [160125 11:30]: > > Could someone please sponsor it? > > > > ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1 > > Uploaded (and already in sid). > > Best, > -- > ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler > : :' : Debian Developer > `. `'

Re: RFS: ruby-crb-blast 0.6.4-1

2016-01-25 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Michael Crusoe [160125 23:12]: > Could someone please sponsor it? > > ruby-crb-blast 0.6.4-1 Had just a quick look, but the Build-Depends are duplicated: ruby-bio (>= 1.4), ruby-bio (>= 1.4.3), ruby-fixwhich (>= 1.0), ruby-fixwhich (

RFS: ruby-crb-blast 0.6.4-1

2016-01-25 Thread Michael Crusoe
Hoopla, The following packages is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Could someone please sponsor it? ruby-crb-blast 0.6.4-1 This package is my last Ruby dependency for transrate: https://github.com/Bla

Re: RFS: ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1

2016-01-25 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Michael Crusoe [160125 11:30]: > Could someone please sponsor it? > > ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1 Uploaded (and already in sid). Best, -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `-

Bug#800742: marked as done (ITP: ruby-fixwhich -- ruby module that emulates the 'which' program)

2016-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jan 2016 20:00:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#800742: fixed in ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #800742, regarding ITP: ruby-fixwhich -- ruby module that emulates the 'which' program to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#800734: marked as done (ITP: ruby-threach -- Threaded each)

2016-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:00:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#800734: fixed in ruby-threach 0.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #800734, regarding ITP: ruby-threach -- Threaded each to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Re: RFS: ruby-hamster 2.0.0-1

2016-01-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Hanno Zulla] >> - One of the patches is missing the Applied-Upstream header. > > I did not find a policy that explains an applied upstream header. Could > you point me to it, please? See http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ >. > I was told on #debian-ruby to use Expat instead of MIT if it's that >

RFS: ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1

2016-01-25 Thread Michael Crusoe
Hoopla, The following packages is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby /Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Could someone please sponsor it? ruby-fixwhich 1.0.2-1 This package is another dependency for transrate: https://github.com/Blahah/t

Re: RFS: ruby-wavefile 0.6.0-1

2016-01-25 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Petter Reinholdtsen [160125 10:48]: > [Hanno Zulla] > > I'm not familiar with the approval process within pkg-ruby-extras, but > > I had assumed that the uploader address would be fixed once a member > > of the ruby team had a look at it. > > I am not familiar with this process either, and hope

Re: RFS: ruby-wavefile 0.6.0-1

2016-01-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Hanno Zulla] > I'm not familiar with the approval process within pkg-ruby-extras, but > I had assumed that the uploader address would be fixed once a member > of the ruby team had a look at it. I am not familiar with this process either, and hope someone can clearify. I suspect you believe uploa

Re: RFS: ruby-hamster 2.0.0-1

2016-01-25 Thread Hanno Zulla
Hi, thanks. > - You should list yourself and perhaps others as uploaders. Again, I'd want the members of the ruby team (who usually approve new gems in pkg-ruby-extras) to have a look first. > - The license of debian/* (GPL-2.0+) and the rest of the package () >differ and patches in debia

Re: RFS: ruby-wavefile 0.6.0-1

2016-01-25 Thread Hanno Zulla
Hi, > - The lisense of debian/* (GPL-2.0+) and the rest of the package > (Expat) differ, meaning future stuff in debian/patches/* can not be > merged into upstream without a license change. Is this intentional? No. Thanks, I will fix that. > Unless someone with more ruby knowledge than me pr