Re: Ruby BoF at Debconf15: which format?

2015-06-29 Thread Balasankar C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > That makes sense; in the case, we could probably say we don't need > proper video coverage (thus saving it for events with actually > useful recordings), and then use something like firefox hello to > provide a live audio/video link for remote poe

Re: Ruby BoF at Debconf15: which format?

2015-06-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 03:28:19PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Cédric Boutillier [150628 08:47]: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:12:45AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > Can you please read the message below and let me know what you think? > > > > Hi, >

Re: rfs:ruby-rails-assets-perfect-scrollbar

2015-06-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Monday 29 June 2015 12:37 AM, Syam G Krishnan wrote: > It builds fine in pbuilder and lintian clean. > > you can find the package at: > > https://gitlab.com/debian-diaspora/ruby-rails-assets-perfect-scrollbar Create an account at alioth.debian.org and request membership to https://alioth.debi

Re: Binary executable name conflicts with existing package

2015-06-29 Thread Balasankar C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Since there is no reply from upstream, I've decided to rename the binary to 'rexical' (as it was once in the upstream). Is there any specific way to let the users know about this change? Any way to inform them with a message once they install? -

Re: help with ruby-eco, ruby-eco-source packages

2015-06-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 05:28 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > backbone-on-rails has a runtime dependency on eco and eco needs > eco-source. eco-source has a minified eco.js and we have to generate > this to be included in debian. > > But when I run cake.coffeescript (on github tarball) I get