Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:20:46AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > On 2015-06-16 10:18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > >I am the one to be sorry. I completely misread your email. Because of > >the context of a previous email about rex, I thought you renamed the tool > >in bin/ to ruby-rotp to avoid collis

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

On 2015-06-16 10:18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: I am the one to be sorry. I completely misread your email. Because of the context of a previous email about rex, I thought you renamed the tool in bin/ to ruby-rotp to avoid collisions. My bad. Sorry again for the confusion my message could have cau

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:24:18AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > On 16 June 2015 2:20:24 am IST, "Cédric Boutillier" wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:12:03PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime > >> dependency in the dependen

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

On 16 June 2015 2:20:24 am IST, "Cédric Boutillier" wrote: >On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:12:03PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: >> Hi, >> I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime >> dependency in the dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy. >> Since it requires RSpec 3, I

Re: RFS: ruby-rotp

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:12:03PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > Hi, > I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime > dependency in the dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy. > Since it requires RSpec 3, I have targeted it for experimental. It > builds fine in chroot (w

Re: Gem which uses dummy rails app for tests

On ഞായര്‍ 14 ജൂണ്‍ 2015 11:39 വൈകു, Balasankar C wrote: > Hi, > Is there any documentation available on how to handle gems that use a > dummy rails app to test their functionality? I patched out the bundler > requirements but am getting this error > > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rails/application/co

Re: RSpec 3.3 in unstable (was: Now building against Ruby 2.2 (and still against 2.1) in unstable)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 05:44:09PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: [...] > > Speaking of breaking things, can we please have ruby-spec >= 3 and > > ruby-rspec-its in unstable? Several of the new versions of the pac

RSpec 3.3 in unstable (was: Now building against Ruby 2.2 (and still against 2.1) in unstable)

Hi Antonio, On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 05:44:09PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello everyone, > I have just uploaded ruby-defaults 1:2.1.5.1 to unstable, adding ruby2.2 > to the list of supported interpreters. This means that from now on: \o/ > Speaking of breaking things, can we please have