Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:08:37PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:22:01PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> > I don't see any problem with having (many) inactive members
> > in the team list.
> I agree.
Ok, thank you for your input. I understand your point. Let's ke
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:15:29PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as discussed in the Ruby BoF on Debconf2014 we are planing a next Ruby Team
> sprint.
>
> We had a Team sprint in January 2014 before the Mini Debconf in Paris. It was
> our first
> Ruby sprint, we had a really cool tim
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:22:01PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is the point only to indicate the size of the ruby team?
>
> I suppose they aren't in Uploaders then in any package?
>
> I don't think that this is a good idea. I am member of quite a lot
> of projects on alioth, but perhap
Hi!
Is the point only to indicate the size of the ruby team?
I suppose they aren't in Uploaders then in any package?
I don't think that this is a good idea. I am member of quite a lot
of projects on alioth, but perhaps commit seldom to some of
them. But when I want to take up the work I can do s
Hi all,
Looking at the very long list of team members on Alioth (~120 names),
one may have the impression that the team is overstaffed, which is
everything but true. Therefore I would like to remove from the list
people who haven't committed to a Git repository for a long time.
As a first step, I
5 matches
Mail list logo
