Re: Proposed new initiative: include HTML documentation

2014-09-02 Thread Per Andersson
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:03:03AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: >> Your approach proposes to run rdoc as a part of dh_ruby. I have a few >> questions about that: >> - what do we do for packages needing specific options parameters? >>

Re: Proposed new initiative: include HTML documentation

2014-09-02 Thread Per Andersson
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi Caitlin, > > First of all, thanks for all the effort you have been putting in the > Ruby packages. It is really appreciated, and you already a valuable > member of our team. :) Indeed, thank you! > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:29:48PM -

Re: RFS: rake

2014-09-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:13:25PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > I have updated rake in git. I have also made several changes to the > packaging. The RDoc documentation is now built and included in a separate > binary package, rake-doc. I have created a new manpage, and have also > submitted i

Re: Proposed new initiative: include HTML documentation

2014-09-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Caitlin, First of all, thanks for all the effort you have been putting in the Ruby packages. It is really appreciated, and you already a valuable member of our team. :) On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:29:48PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > I would like some feedback as to whether this is a worthwhil