Re: RFS: sup-mail

Hi! Regarding sup-mail I am also working with switching upstreams for ruby-ncurses (ncursesw-ruby is now maintained by the Sup developers) and ruby-rubymail to rmail-sup (also maintained by the Sup developers). -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: 2 diffrent ruby-kakasi implemntations

At Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:47:40 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Maybe use the name ruby-kakasi-ffi for the package (that would be what > gem2deb would propose), and add a Provides: ruby-kakasi, Replaces: > ruby-kakasi (<< some version) in debian/control? (Breaks: is probably > not needed since there

Re: Proposed new initiative: include HTML documentation

Hi! I have seen your answers but haven't had time to digest or respond to it. I'll return with an answer as soon as I can, hopefully within a week. -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Fwd: "rails tests PASSED on unstable/amd64" (Debian CI)

FYI: Rails now passes its full-stack some test on unstable. :) - Forwarded message from Debian CI - Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:00:57 - From: Debian CI Subject: rails tests PASSED on unstable/amd64 The te