Re: RFS: ruby-execjs, ruby-mail, ruby-session

On 29/07/14 03:33 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:03:50AM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: So, I've reincluded the coffeescript test, and am running into problems because it tries to open an external site. In researching the issue, I've seen quite a few bug reports saying te

Re: Hello friendly Ruby people

On 25/07/14 4:08 PM, "Ondřej Surý" wrote: > Hi Tim, > > have you read: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging ? > > > It's a good start. > > Cheers, > Ondrej Hi Ondrej. After a careful re-read of the Ruby packaging guide I fixed the bui

Re: RFS: ruby-i18n

Hello Cédric, > I tried to build ruby-i18n, and I got a test failure: > > Finished in 1.833170s, 601.1444 runs/s, 855.3489 assertions/s. > > 8<-- > 1) Failure: > I18nBackendChainTest#test_bulk_lookup_collects_results_from_all_backends > [/«PKGBUILDDIR»/test/back

Re: RFS: ruby-i18n

Hi Jonas, On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:27:31PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote: > Hello, > I have updated i18n with a new upstream version: > ruby-i18n (0.6.11-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Team upload. >* Imported Upstream version 0.6.11 >* removed fix_mocha.patch, included by upstream

Re: RFS: ruby-execjs, ruby-mail, ruby-session

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:03:50AM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > So, I've reincluded the coffeescript test, and am running into problems > because it tries to open an external site. In researching the issue, I've > seen quite a few bug reports saying test suites should not rely on an > external c

RFS: ruby-i18n

Hello, I have updated i18n with a new upstream version: ruby-i18n (0.6.11-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Imported Upstream version 0.6.11 * removed fix_mocha.patch, included by upstream * refreshed strip_bundler patch * d/docs: upstream change readme name * added