Re: RFS: ruby-bdb [RC]

Hi David, The changes look great. However, it fails to build here, with an error saying it cannot find "bdb". If you want to run the tests at build time, you'll probably need (most of) the dependencies to be added to Build-Depends too. Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-bdb [RC]

Hi Cédric, El Domingo, 18 de mayo de 2014 09:25:29 Cédric Boutillier escribió: > > - Maybe don't bump the standards-version. Let's keep the diff minimal. > No changes is required except changing this number. That's the role of > the maintainer that the packages complies to some specific stand

Re: DONE: ruby-ipaddress, roodi; left: ruby-dbi, ruby-re2

Cédric On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 07:37:18PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > HI, > El Martes, 6 de mayo de 2014 11:46:51 Cédric Boutillier escribió: > > About ruby-dbi: > > - could you please put a little more verbose description to your patch? > > - could you also add a debian/ruby-dbi.doc-base file

Re: RFS: ruby-bdb [RC]

Hi David, I got also two warnings with your dhelp, that probably should be fixed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/dhelp/exporter/html.rb:87: warning: assigned but unused variable - e /usr/sbin/dhelp_parse:119: warning: File.exists? is a deprecated name, use File.exist? instead (or the -w should be

Re: RFS: ruby-bdb [RC]

Hi David, On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:25:01PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > Hi, > El Martes, 6 de mayo de 2014 01:54:22 Cédric Boutillier escribió: > > I am considering NMUing dhelp now we have a working ruby-bdb. Attached > > my current patch against dhelp. Let me know if you want to prepare the >