Re: ruby-defaults with switch to ruby2.1 uploaded to experimental

* Antonio Terceiro [140507 23:26]: [..] > I have just uploaded ruby-defaults to experimental, switching the > default to ruby2.1 and dropping ruby2.0 from ruby-all-dev. That means > that if you have ruby-all-dev >= 1:2.1.0.0 installed, compiled > extensions for ruby2.0 will no longer be built. Gr

ruby-defaults with switch to ruby2.1 uploaded to experimental

Hello everyone, As we might be aware already, our plan is to ship jessie with Ruby 2.1 as the default (and only) Ruby interpreter. I have just uploaded ruby-defaults to experimental, switching the default to ruby2.1 and dropping ruby2.0 from ruby-all-dev. That means that if you have ruby-all-dev

Re: RFS: ruby-bdb [RC]

Hi, El Martes, 6 de mayo de 2014 01:54:22 Cédric Boutillier escribió: > I am considering NMUing dhelp now we have a working ruby-bdb. Attached > my current patch against dhelp. Let me know if you want to prepare the > dhelp NMU yourself :) I never do one. Well if there is not much hurry for it, I

Re: ruby-sqlite3 FTBFS

Hi, El Martes, 6 de mayo de 2014 22:50:29 Christian Hofstaedtler escribió: > * Antonio Terceiro [140506 22:48]: > > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:57:37AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:00:58PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > > > > El Domingo, 4 de mayo de 2014 16:06:50

Re: DONE: ruby-ipaddress, roodi; left: ruby-dbi, ruby-re2

Hi, El Martes, 6 de mayo de 2014 11:46:51 Cédric Boutillier escribió: > About ruby-dbi: > - could you please put a little more verbose description to your patch? > - please forward them upstream and put a link in their header > - could you also add a debian/ruby-dbi.doc-base file for doc-base >