RFC: ruby-coveralls (NEW)

Hi folks, Before uploading this NEW package I would appreciate if somebody more experienced with Ruby packaging than myself can take a brief look[1] at ruby-coveralls package. I think it's mostly OK, lintian clean, etc. However, I'm not quite sure If I got right the testing part. In particular t

Bug#740779: ITP: ruby-coveralls -- Ruby implementation of the Coveralls API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: ruby-coveralls Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Nick Merwin , Wil Gieseler * URL : https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-ruby * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: R

Bug#740768: ITP: ruby-sawyer -- HTTP/REST API client Ruby library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: ruby-sawyer Version : 0.5.3 Upstream Author : Rick Olson * URL : https://github.com/lostisland/sawyer * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: Ruby Description : HTTP/REST API client li

Re: RFS: ruby-ice-nine

Hello Cédric, > > Git: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-ice-nine.git > > > Could any dd please have a look? > Could you please split your patch into two: > - one removing devtools/spec_helper from spec/spec_helper > - the other commenting commenting out the shared examples > the

Bug#740736: ITP: ruby-octokit -- Ruby toolkit for the GitHub API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: ruby-octokit Version : 2.7.0 Upstream Author : Wynn Netherland , Erik Michaels-Ober , Clint Shryock * URL : http://octokit.github.io/octokit.rb/ * License

Bug#740735: ITP: ruby-docker-api -- Ruby gem to interact with docker.io remote API

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: ruby-docker-api Version : 1.8.2 Upstream Author : Swipely, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/swipely/docker-api * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Ruby gem to inte

Re: Correct naming for docker-api gem package

Hi Cédric, On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > According to our conventions, it should be ruby-docker-api. > There is a 'docker' gem. Should it be one day package, it will be the > one getting the ruby-docker name. That's right. I should have check first if there was a gem

ruby-stamp uploaded

Hi Daniel, For your information, I made a few slight modifications to your package ruby-stamp and uploaded it. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-ice-nine

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:28:15PM +0100, Jonas Genannt wrote: > Hello, > another Gitlab gem: > ruby-ice-nine (0.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Initial release (Closes: #740623) > Git: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-ice-nine.git > Could any dd please have a look