After I started working on it, I felt I coud make the tests work. First
hurdle was to find a socks server I can use. After some tries I got hpsockd
to work. Then I ran apache locally to test it without an internet
connection. But getting apache to start in the build env was difficult, so
I settled
2013/6/4 Christian Hofstaedtler :
> I took a quick look at this, and I think you're between a rock and a
> hard place either way.
>
> If you find a SOCKS proxy which you can launch at build time, the
> test will still need internet access -- or you provide another
> service just for testing as well
2013/6/3 Praveen A :
>> Ah! I just uploaded 0.6.1! Just pull, before you update.
>
> There is conflict, I will just remove my upload instead.
Before my dcut commands could remove it, it was already accepted. I
merged the changes, but it won't let me push upstream or pristine-tar
branches, can I do
* Praveen A [130603 15:37]:
> Once tests are enabled, it needs em-socksify as a build dependency. I
> have problems running tests of em-socksify
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710043
>
> If anyone can help me fix that, it would be great. It needs a socks
> proxy running on
* Sam Ruby [130603 20:43]:
> On 06/03/2013 12:17 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
[..]
> Looking for other 'repositories' I came across:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Obtaining_the_master_repository
>
> But that one doesn't appear to have been updated today:
>
> http://anonsc
Sam,
You can just substitute the package name in the git clone url to get other
packages. So change ruby-shoulda-matchers to ruby-i18n to checkout i18n
debian package repo. Follow the same process for building it.
Praveen
On Jun 4, 2013 12:12 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
On 06/03/2013 12:17 PM, Chris
On 06/03/2013 12:17 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hey everybody,
The team repository has updated packages for:
ruby-mail
ruby-journey
ruby-rack
ruby-i18n
It also carries patches to:
ruby-actionpack-3.2
ruby-activesupport-3.2
ruby-activemodel-3.2
If you could give these
Hey everybody,
The team repository has updated packages for:
ruby-mail
ruby-journey
ruby-rack
ruby-i18n
It also carries patches to:
ruby-actionpack-3.2
ruby-activesupport-3.2
ruby-activemodel-3.2
If you could give these a try (by building from the repo), that'd be
great.
FWIW:
rai
On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Sam,
* Sam Ruby [130603 16:05]:
On 06/03/2013 09:49 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Praveen, Sam,
* Praveen A [130603 15:45]:
2013/6/3 Praveen A :
I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
solve myself - ra
Sam,
* Sam Ruby [130603 16:05]:
> On 06/03/2013 09:49 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> >Praveen, Sam,
> >
> >* Praveen A [130603 15:45]:
> >>2013/6/3 Praveen A :
> >>>I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
> >>>solve myself - rails specific stuff :)
> >>
> >>Late
Dear Nitesh,
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:48:31PM +0530, Nitesh A Jain wrote:
> I have made changes as recommended by Cedric and have the pushed the changes.
> Also I have now moved it to git.debian.org so you can download it from there
> git://git.debian.org/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-rainbow.git
> Pl
Thank you Cedric
I will make the changes tomorrow as i have an exam to write
On 3 Jun 2013 19:35, "Cédric Boutillier"
wrote:
> Dear Nitesh,
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:48:31PM +0530, Nitesh A Jain wrote:
> > I have made changes as recommended by Cedric and have the pushed the
> changes.
> > A
2013/6/3 Praveen A :
> 2013/6/3 Christian Hofstaedtler :
>> Praveen, Sam,
>> activesupport right now requires '= 0.6.1' for i18n. I'm working on
>> updating i18n to 0.6.4, and adding a patch to activesupport to say
>> '>= 0.6.1'.
>
> Christian,
>
> Ah! I just uploaded 0.6.1! Just pull, before you u
On 06/03/2013 09:49 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Praveen, Sam,
* Praveen A [130603 15:45]:
2013/6/3 Praveen A :
I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
solve myself - rails specific stuff :)
Latest version of i18n is 0.6.4. Should we update it to latest
ver
2013/6/3 Christian Hofstaedtler :
> Praveen, Sam,
> activesupport right now requires '= 0.6.1' for i18n. I'm working on
> updating i18n to 0.6.4, and adding a patch to activesupport to say
> '>= 0.6.1'.
Christian,
Ah! I just uploaded 0.6.1! Just pull, before you update.
> Next thing on my list i
Praveen, Sam,
* Praveen A [130603 15:45]:
> 2013/6/3 Praveen A :
> > I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
> > solve myself - rails specific stuff :)
>
> Latest version of i18n is 0.6.4. Should we update it to latest
> version? For now I'll update to 0.6.1 and if i
2013/6/3 Praveen A :
> I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
> solve myself - rails specific stuff :)
Latest version of i18n is 0.6.4. Should we update it to latest
version? For now I'll update to 0.6.1 and if it is better to update to
latest, I will update it later.
2013/6/3 Sam Ruby :
> I believe I only have 1.9.3p194 installed at this point.
>
> I probably didn't provide enough background. Knowing that the tests for
> shoulda-matchers depend on 'rails new testapp' working, I'm trying to see if
> that works before trying shoulda-matchers again.
>
> I presume
2013/6/3 Christian Hofstaedtler :
> Hi,
>
> I see ruby-em-http-request 1.0.3 is in the team repository, and
> already tagged for unstable. -- But it doesn't show up in unstable?
I should have kept UNRELEASED in the changelog, sorry. It is not
tagged (didn't add git tag) as I did not upload it.
>
On 06/03/2013 08:04 AM, Praveen A wrote:
Only ruby 1.8 was not finding i18n, with ruby 1.9, it was showing only
missing rails. Did you notice that?
I believe I only have 1.9.3p194 installed at this point.
I probably didn't provide enough background. Knowing that the tests for
shoulda-matcher
Hi,
I see ruby-em-http-request 1.0.3 is in the team repository, and
already tagged for unstable. -- But it doesn't show up in unstable?
Will this be uploaded soon or is there some issue?
Thanks,
C.
--
Christian Hofstaedtler | design, deploy, scale
http://christian.hofstaedtler.
Only ruby 1.8 was not finding i18n, with ruby 1.9, it was showing only
missing rails. Did you notice that?
On Jun 3, 2013 4:04 PM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
On 06/03/2013 02:12 AM, Praveen A wrote: > > 2013/6/3 Praveen A <
prav...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi Sam, >...
Getting further...
Resolving dependencies
On 06/03/2013 02:12 AM, Praveen A wrote:
2013/6/3 Praveen A :
Hi Sam,
There was a bug in actionpack which made it unavailable to rubygems and
bundler. It is fixed by a recent upload 3.2.13-6. Can you update actionpack
and try the tests again? As Christian said, we should remove any
Gemfile.lock
23 matches
Mail list logo
