Re: [DRE-maint] RFS: ruby-hiera 0.3.0-1, ruby-hiera-puppet 0.3.0-1

2012-06-18 Thread Patrick Ringl
Hi, that was a fast one tho .. the 'problem' is the new YAML parser (Psych vs Syck) - while Syck was accepting the default YAML shipped by hiera, Psych was not .. at least now 'hiera' itself seems to work flawlessly on 1.9.1 Gonna take a look into hiera-puppet tomorrow .. seems as if this wi

Re: [DRE-maint] RFS: ruby-hiera 0.3.0-1, ruby-hiera-puppet 0.3.0-1

2012-06-18 Thread Patrick Ringl
Hi Christian and Mika, > > I am not sure if packaging the release-candidate makes more sense > > - personally I'd really love to hear different opinions about it. > > If we may find a common understanding (especially the one > > sponsoring it) I can also package the release candidate in the > > f

Bug#678055: dhelp: Porting dhelp to use OptionParser instead of CommandLine::Application

2012-06-18 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Package: dhelp Version: 0.6.20 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, We have decided Wheezy will be released with Ruby 1.9.1 as the default interpreter¹, leaving Ruby 1.8 as an option, and committing to remove it by Wheezy+1. This package, dhelp, depends on CommandLine::Application (in package rub

Re: Dropping ruby-commandline, or declaring it 1.8-only?

2012-06-18 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 08:39:33AM -0300]: > In your opinion, which one would require less effort? > > - porting dhelp to use OptionParser > - porting ruby-commandline to 1.9 Both are half-done :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: Dropping ruby-commandline, or declaring it 1.8-only?

2012-06-18 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:10:38AM +0200]: > I investigated a few days ago this problem, and found at least why it > silently fails with Ruby1.9: with Ruby 1.9, private_instance_methods > returns a list of symbols, not a list of strings, so the machinery to > initialize the app

Re: [DRE-maint] RFS: ruby-hiera 0.3.0-1, ruby-hiera-puppet 0.3.0-1

2012-06-18 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Hi Patrick, * Patrick Ringl [120618 17:48]: [..] > > > * ruby1.8: Now that ruby1.9.1 is the default ruby, it might not be a > > good idea to introduce a package that doesn't work on 1.9.x, > > especially when the executables say '/usr/bin/env ruby' (which > > likely will resolve to ruby1.9.1 on

Re: [DRE-maint] RFS: ruby-hiera 0.3.0-1, ruby-hiera-puppet 0.3.0-1

2012-06-18 Thread Patrick Ringl
Hi Christian, > > * debian/ruby-hiera.substvars and debian/ruby-hiera-puppet.substvars > are checked into git, but are cleaned before building the source. > This makes building straight from git fail. Ah, yea .. I totally missed *not to* use '--git-ignore-new', good one (hence my RFS since in f

Re: RFS: ruby-hiera 0.3.0-1, ruby-hiera-puppet 0.3.0-1

2012-06-18 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Hi Patrick, Thanks for working on hiera for Debian. I've taken a quick look at your packages, and have the following comments: * debian/ruby-hiera.substvars and debian/ruby-hiera-puppet.substvars are checked into git, but are cleaned before building the source. This makes building straight from