RFS: ruby-innate (transition to the new policy)

Hi! I've pushed to the repository a proposition for the packaging of ruby-innate. It builds fine with cowbuilder and is lintian clean. Could you please review and possibly upload this package? Thanks! Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:05:47AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of 2012-05-27 23:32:41 -0700: > > > Thanks! You've addressed all my concerns. This version of sup-mail is > > working > > very well, and I am using it to answer right now. I believe it can go i

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of 2012-05-27 23:32:41 -0700: > Hi! > > Excerpts from Per Andersson's message of sam. mai 26 00:56:52 +0200 2012: > > > > I managed to fix this. See [0] for the trivial fix. Please review and > > try it out. > > > > [0] > > http://anonscm.debian.org/git

Re: [Fwd: RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 (RFP: 641973)]

Hi! Thanks for packaging ruby-juicer. I had a quick look at your package and I have a few remarks: * debian/copyright: - if you use the same license as upstream for your packaging, please use a standalone paragraph for the license and just refer to it in the corresponding Files: paragr

Re: [Fwd: RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 (RFP: 641973)]

Hi all, I have updated the package ruby-juicer fixing lintian warnings. Cheers Jean Le jeudi 24 mai 2012 à 20:00 +0200, Jean Parpaillon a écrit : > FYI > pièce jointe message de courriel (1.0.16-1 (RFP: 641973)), "Message > transféré - RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 (RFP: 641973)" > > Message