Re: RFS: kramdown

Hi, Vincent, At Sun, 6 May 2012 20:26:21 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > > At Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:03:35 +0200, > > Vincent Fourmond wrote: > >> > > - snip - > >>   Hmmm. It seems it got lost somehow... Don't forget to set the suite > >>

RFS: ruby-treetop (fix RC bug + details)

Hi, I pushed a proposition for a new debian version of ruby-treetop, fixing RC bug #665251, as well as some details (syntax in manpage, and registration of documentation with doc-base). Could you please review and upload this version? N.B.: I've added my name to Uploaders. If you find it inappro

Re: RFS: kramdown

Hi Youhei, On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > At Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:03:35 +0200, > Vincent Fourmond wrote: >> > - snip - >>   Hmmm. It seems it got lost somehow... Don't forget to set the suite >> to unstable and not UNRELEASED ;-)... > > Oops, Sorry I forgot it. > >> Unf

RFS: yard (new upstream version)

Hi! I updated the repository of yard, to contain a new upstream version. The tests are now working with this new upstream version, so the results are not ignored anymore. I also made a few changes, such as using libjs-jquery instead of the embedded copy, and adding manpages for the binaries. Coul