On haml-elisp (and about taking it off the group)

2012-01-05 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Hi, Paul did a great job by migrating a package I had pending to do for a long time, libhaml-ruby → ruby-haml. Now, this migration included a deep split - Out of the original package, there is now a separate ruby-sass... And the Emacs mode, haml-elisp, was dropped. Nathan Weizenbaum, the upstream

Re: About apt-listbugs and ruby 1.9.x

2012-01-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Francesco Poli escreveu isso aí: > Hi everybody, > I've been informed by Serafeim (Cc:ed) that apt-listbugs is being > discussed as one of the blockers for the ruby 1.8.x → 1.9.x migration > in Debian: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/01/msg00011.html > > Since I am one of the two co-mai

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Sam Ruby escreveu isso aí: > On 01/04/2012 08:58 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> > >>I don't want to guess what problems you were seeing. Can you tell > >>me of a specific command (complete with arguments) that doesn't > >>work? > > > >It failed for me when I tried to install another package (try a

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-05 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:41:16PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > Thanks Antonio. I forgot to check for conflicts :( > > I am now making ruby-blankslate conflict with ruby-builder, and I > > propose the alternative ruby-blankslate | ruby-builder for > > (bu

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-05 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/05/2012 01:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 04/01/12 at 17:22 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded copies should al