Re: RFS: ruby-text

2011-10-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/10/11 at 16:16 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > Hi, > new tentative to find a fellow DD to sponsor the package ruby-text > (0.2.0-1). This is a dependency package for the ruby-cassiopee package > (waiting in new packages for the moment). > > Someone already had a first review on it, now I woul

Re: Fwd: Need newer rdoc

2011-10-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/10/11 at 16:53 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > As suggested by Lucas... > > (Please Cc: me) > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Ondřej Surý > Date: Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:34 > Subject: Need newer rdoc > To: pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > > Hi, > > I

Re: RFS: ruby-liquid

2011-10-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/10/11 at 00:37 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > I have finished preparing the packaging of ruby-liquid, a necessary > package to enable tests for ruby-tilt, as listed in the NeedPackaging > file of the repository. > > The package is lintian clean, builds fine in a clean chroot. I h

[m...@tsg.ne.jp: [ruby-core:40301] A rough release schedule for 2.0.0]

2011-10-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
FYI. Ruby 2.0 for wheezy+1? Lucas - Forwarded message from Yusuke Endoh - From: Yusuke Endoh To: ruby developers list , ruby developers list Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:43:25 +0900 Subject: [ruby-core:40301] A rough release schedule for 2.0.0 Reply-To: ruby-c...@ruby-lang.org List-Id:

Re: RFS: ruby-pdf-inspector

2011-10-24 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 01:18:34AM +0200]: > I have finished the packaging of ruby-pdf-inspector, a build-dependency > for ruby-prawn, needed for the transition to the new policy. > > The package is lintian clean, builds fine in a clean chroot. I > successfully installed it an