On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:46:45PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> You have not updated the pristine-tar branch to include 0.10.1 :(
Please accept my apologies. I forgot to push it from a local repository.
It should be fixed now.
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:59:07PM +0200]:
> Hi!
>
> Upstream just released a version with only change the fix of the faulty
> license header that made 0.10.0+real to be rejected from the archive.
> The only changes from the package Antonio reviewed is:
> - header or lib/pdf/r
Antonio Terceiro dijo [Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 01:50:58PM -0300]:
> > Yes, I find it very sensible. Of course, this could be part of the
> > gem2deb procedure, overridable in case is either not correctly
> > guessed, or in case there is more than one library. The ideal would be
> > to include every s
Hi!
Upstream just released a version with only change the fix of the faulty
license header that made 0.10.0+real to be rejected from the archive.
The only changes from the package Antonio reviewed is:
- header or lib/pdf/reader/glyphlist.txt removed by upstream
- copyright entry for this file remo
Hi,
I just wanted to mention that, in order to increase quality of our
repository, I am willing to fix the watch files of some repositories, in
order to eliminate some entries in the PET page.
Therefore I may commit to your repositories. I hope it will not annoy anybody.
Best regards,
C
5 matches
Mail list logo