Re: JRuby packaging

Alex Young escreveu isso aí: > jruby_1.5.1+dfsg4-2 has been accepted into main. Nice. :) > It'd probably be a good idea for someone more familiar with the new > Ruby policy to take a quick look at the package (if that hasn't > already happened) to make sure there's nothing lurking that needs > at

status of 1.9[.3] and wheezy

Hi, Ruby 1.9.3 RC1 was released today. I've updated the ruby1.9.1 package to that version (in the experimental branch of the git repo). I've also tried to rebuild all packages maintained by pkg-ruby-extras (and using gem2deb) with that version with that version. The vast majority built fine (inc

Re: RFS: ruby-test-spec

Hi Cédric, Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > This package depends and build-depends on ruby-test-unit, which is also > ready for review. Please ping again when ruby-test-unit is sorted out. -- Antonio Terceiro signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: ruby-mixlib-config is ready for upload (was Re: License for debian packaging of libmixlib-config-ruby)

Hi Praveen, Praveen A escreveu isso aí: > Thanks! With that ruby-mixlib-config is ready for upload. It is > avilable in our git repo, it builds with pbuilder, it is lintian > clean, uscan works, has dep5 copyright, has clean git status after > build. Please review and upload. It is a dependency fo

introducing a ruby-common package, with update-ruby-alternatives tool

Hello Akira and Daigo, Some time ago we discussed adding a tool called update-ruby-alternatives, which would be a helper to "fully switch" between Ruby interpreters as the default one. This is needed because `ruby` and `gem` are not maintained together in the same alternatives entry because rubyge

Re: RFS: ruby-test-unit

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:56:40AM -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > Or I could mention in a README.Debian that one may expect some > > changes in the behavior of testrb1.8 (more options, could be run with > > ruby1.9.1) and testrb1.9.1 (not working) when ruby

Re: gem2deb shouldn't rewrite shebangs of shell scripts

Hello Dmitry, Dmitry Borodaenko escreveu isso aí: > gem2deb 0.2.9 happily rewrote the shebang line of a shell script in > /usr/bin of my package. Attached patch makes it only do that if ruby is > mentioned anywhere in the first line of the script: if it's not, and > there is a shebang in the line

Re: RFS: ruby-test-unit

Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:47:48PM +0530, Praveen A wrote: > > 2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier : > > > Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your > > > comments. > > > Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby? > > We