Bug#642500: ITP: rbenv -- Simple per-user Ruby version manager

2011-09-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Antonio Terceiro * Package name: rbenv Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Author : Sam Stephenson * URL : https://github.com/sstephenson/rbenv * License : MIT Programming Lang: Bash Description : Simple per-user Ruby versio

Re: RFS: ruby-test-unit

2011-09-22 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:47:48PM +0530, Praveen A wrote: > 2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier : > > Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your comments. > Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby? Well spotted, thank you, that is something I overlooked. Th

Re: RFS: ruby-test-unit

2011-09-22 Thread Praveen A
2011/9/22 Cédric Boutillier : > Thank you very much for reviewing the package. I implemented your comments. Is /usr/bin/testrb exactly same as the one that comes with ruby? > This is something I am struggling with indeed. I thought it could be a > bug in lintian, since the Ruby license is a licen

Re: test failure in new version of ruby-yajl

2011-09-22 Thread Praveen A
2011/9/22 Praveen A : > I was trying to update ruby-yajl to new upstream release, I got this > test failure. I guess I will report it upstream. reported upstream https://github.com/brianmario/yajl-ruby/issues/83 -- പ്രവീണ്‍ അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്‍ You have to keep reminding your government that you

Re: rails error when building ruby-haml - no such file to load -- initializer (MissingSourceFile)

2011-09-22 Thread Praveen A
2011/9/21 Praveen A : > 2011/9/20 Praveen A : >> Created a github issue for this >> https://github.com/nex3/haml/issues/434 > > Upstream response, > > "To be precise, the tests don't require a Rails app; they just require > Rails as a library. If you want to be thorough, I'd recommend running > `ra

Re: RFS: ruby-test-unit

2011-09-22 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Dear Praveen, On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:12:46AM +0530, Praveen A wrote: > Builds in clean chroot, it is lintian clean. > I think you can remove the commented dependency section (only > development dependencies are listed) in control file. > Maybe you can add a comment to rules why you are over