Re: How to handle libraries bundled with either Ruby 1.8 or Ruby 1.9 (was "Debian Ruby packaging changes")

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > What about 2), e.g. rake and rubygems? Do you think we could always > > default to the non-bundled version for them as well? > > It's a bit tricky. For example, rdoc 1 (shipped in Ruby 1.8) is very > different from rdoc 2 & 3 (shipped in 1.9). Also, while it's

Re: Breaks: instead of Conflicts: for transitional packages

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí: >>   That also means that we should add this particular feature >> (precedence of the vendor dir over system dir in RUBYLIB path) in >> the Ruby policy. > > Yes, and that the site dir must have precedenc