Re: RFS: ruby-cairo

2011-06-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/06/11 at 12:08 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > On 19/06/11 at 19:44 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > The package is in our git repository: > > > git.debian.org:/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-cairo.git > > > > > > This is another build dependency of ruby-g

Re: Breaks: instead of Conflicts: for transitional packages

2011-06-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/06/11 at 12:45 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Antonio Terceiro escreveu isso aí: > > My intuition is that this type of thing should be implemented in lintian > > so that even packages that are not using gem2deb can be checked. > > In time: I intend to at least make gem2deb complain if ther

Re: How to handle libraries bundled with either Ruby 1.8 or Ruby 1.9 (was "Debian Ruby packaging changes")

2011-06-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/06/11 at 12:05 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello all, > > I wish to raise a discussion on this point. > > Francesco and Thomas, sorry if it goes way beyond your goals, but you > raised a point that the Ruby team probably needs to reach a consensus > on. > > All, please make sure you k

Re: Breaks: instead of Conflicts: for transitional packages

2011-06-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Vincent, Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí: > Hello ! > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > > I've just updated gen-ruby-trans-pkgs in gem2deb to do The Right Thing, > > and will upload a new version of gem2deb soon. > > Please wait ;-)... Oops, now it's too l

Re: Breaks: instead of Conflicts: for transitional packages

2011-06-20 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello ! On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > I've just updated gen-ruby-trans-pkgs in gem2deb to do The Right Thing, > and will upload a new version of gem2deb soon. Please wait ;-)... > Please double check your packages and make sure your new ruby-foo > `Breaks: libfo

Re: Breaks: instead of Conflicts: for transitional packages

2011-06-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Antonio Terceiro escreveu isso aí: > My intuition is that this type of thing should be implemented in lintian > so that even packages that are not using gem2deb can be checked. In time: I intend to at least make gem2deb complain if there are any FIXME's in debian/*, since those are generated by ge

Re: Breaks: instead of Conflicts: for transitional packages

2011-06-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 19/06/11 at 19:59 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > These days I noticed that we are using Conflicts: instead of Breaks: in > > our transitional packages, and we should change that. Among other > > reasons, using Breaks: instead of Conflict

Re: RFS: ruby-cairo

2011-06-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 19/06/11 at 19:44 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > The package is in our git repository: > > git.debian.org:/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-cairo.git > > > > This is another build dependency of ruby-gnome2 > > Replaces: libcairo-ruby (<< 0.1.0~FIXME-1~), libcairo

How to handle libraries bundled with either Ruby 1.8 or Ruby 1.9 (was "Debian Ruby packaging changes")

2011-06-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello all, I wish to raise a discussion on this point. Francesco and Thomas, sorry if it goes way beyond your goals, but you raised a point that the Ruby team probably needs to reach a consensus on. All, please make sure you keep debian-ruby@l.d.o copied. Francesco Poli escreveu isso aí: > On M

Re: Debian Ruby packaging changes

2011-06-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:48:08 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] > Quick review of your package: > > - is there a reason not to package https://rubygems.org/gems/soap4r ? > Ok, it might not work with 1.9, but maybe you could backport the changes > from soap4r-ruby1.9 ? [...] > Also, we really want