on the correct dependency for packages with scripts using /usr/bin/ruby

Hello all, I am preparing a package for shoulda-context as part of upgrading shoulda, which got split upstream into three packages. I've sent a patch for lintian to cope with the fact the Ruby-Versions field we introduced with gem2deb is not recognized [1], but I am still missing one lintian error

Re: Ruby BOF @ debconf

Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > Hi, > > I've just submitted a Ruby BOF at debconf. > > I hope that many of you will be able to attend. Put differently: if you > read this email, please apply for Debconf sponsorship! You don't need to > be a DD or DM to be sponsored, and if you don't apply, you

Re: Repackaging libruby-hmac to new ruby packaging policy

Vasudev Kamath escreveu isso aí: > On 14:05 Sat 07 May , Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Vasudev Kamath escreveu isso aí: > > > Hi, > > > I'm member of team pkg-ruby-extras and I would like to repackage > > > libhmac-ruby to meet new Ruby policy in Wheezy[1]. I would like your > > > approval before

RFS: ruby-pgplot 0.1.3-1

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded: Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-pgplot.git Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-pgplot.git;a=summary source: ruby-pgplot packages: - ruby-pgplot - ruby-pgplot-dbg Could you please check and

RFS: ruby-narray 0.5.9p9-1

Hi Lucas, Cc: debian-ruby The following packages are ready to be uploaded: source: ruby-narray packages: - ruby-narray - ruby-narray-dbg Main changes: - Migratie SVN to Git, renaming for New Ruby Policy - libnarray-ruby{,1.8,1.9.1} to ruby-narray - libnarrary-ruby{1.8,1.9.1}-d

Re: Request for review ruby-hmac

On 16:53 Sun 08 May , Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > There's a typo in the descr "algorith*m*" > Fixed it > there are more mentions of ruby-rspec. Fixed it. and tagged the debian directory. Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info http://identi.ca/vasudev vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatu

(Re: RFS: ruby-fftw3 0.4-1)

Hi Lucas, At 8 May 2011 15:01:10 +0200, > > Of course, if narray packages have been changed for transition, I > > (We?)'ll drop libnarray-rubyXX from Build-Depends. Currently, Narray's > > maintainer is Daigo Moriwaki, and is not team-maint. Should I contact to > > him ? > > Yes, please Sorry, I

Re: Request for review ruby-hmac

On 08/05/11 at 17:19 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > On 12:44 Sun 08 May , Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Review: > > debian/control: > > - please uncomment Vcs-* > > Done > > - the description should be rewritten to be useful to debian users. For > > example, the short description should probabl

Ruby BOF @ debconf

Hi, I've just submitted a Ruby BOF at debconf. I hope that many of you will be able to attend. Put differently: if you read this email, please apply for Debconf sponsorship! You don't need to be a DD or DM to be sponsored, and if you don't apply, you will never know if you would have been sponsor

Re: RFS: ruby-fftw3 0.4-1

Hi Lucas, At 8 May 2011 15:01:10 +0200, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > > > > Of course, if narray packages have been changed for transition, I > > (We?)'ll drop libnarray-rubyXX from Build-Depends. Currently, Narray's > > maintainer is Daigo Moriwaki, and is not team-maint. Should I contact to > > hi

Re: RFS: ruby-fftw3 0.4-1

On 08/05/11 at 21:58 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > At 2 May 2011 16:36:05 +0200, > "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > > > Could you please sponsor them? > - snip - > > > source: ruby-ffw3 > > > packages: > > >- ruby-fftw3 > > >- ruby-fftw3-dbg > > > > Thanks, uploaded and tagged

Re: RFS: ruby-fftw3 0.4-1

Hi Lucas, At 2 May 2011 16:36:05 +0200, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > > Could you please sponsor them? - snip - > > source: ruby-ffw3 > > packages: > >- ruby-fftw3 > >- ruby-fftw3-dbg > > Thanks, uploaded and tagged in the git repo. Many Thanks!! > Could you look at converting narray,

Re: Request for review ruby-hmac

On 12:44 Sun 08 May , Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Review: > debian/control: > - please uncomment Vcs-* Done > - the description should be rewritten to be useful to debian users. For > example, the short description should probably say that it's a "Ruby > interface to the HMAC algorithm" or so

Re: Request for review ruby-hmac

On 08/05/11 at 14:00 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Hi, > I've created ruby-hmac package using gem2deb and pushed it to the team > git repository[1]. > > There are some lintian warnings. It suggests me to use Breaks instead > of Conflicts also duplicate short and long description for > transitiona

Re: Request for review ruby-hmac

On 08/05/11 at 14:00 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Hi, > I've created ruby-hmac package using gem2deb and pushed it to the team > git repository[1]. > > There are some lintian warnings. It suggests me to use Breaks instead > of Conflicts also duplicate short and long description for > transitiona

Request for review ruby-hmac

Hi, I've created ruby-hmac package using gem2deb and pushed it to the team git repository[1]. There are some lintian warnings. It suggests me to use Breaks instead of Conflicts also duplicate short and long description for transitional packages (libhmac-ruby1.8 and libhmac-ruby). Some dobuts: 1.