On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> On 19/04/11 at 08:56 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-polyglot".
>>
>> * Package name : ruby-polyglot
>> Version : 0.3.1-1
>> Upstream Author : Clifford Heath
On 19/04/11 at 08:56 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-polyglot".
>
> * Package name: ruby-polyglot
> Version : 0.3.1-1
> Upstream Author : Clifford Heath
> * URL : http://polyglot.rubyforge.org/
> * Licen
Okies, will be redone accordingly, thanks for the help Lucas.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> On 19/04/11 at 10:12 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote:
> > /me had got the results as attached, true the package name must be
> > bundle*r*, rather than bundle. We remove the current pa
On 19/04/11 at 00:12 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
> Hello Lucas,
>
> On 18/04/11 23:17, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > on rewriting the Debian ruby policy: I don't think that a policy is
> > necessary if we standardize on gem2deb. The RubyInWheezy wiki page is a
> > de-facto documentation of how
On 19/04/11 at 10:12 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote:
> /me had got the results as attached, true the package name must be
> bundle*r*, rather than bundle. We remove the current package and redo it,
> thank you.
>
> Reconfirming steps :
> Just gem2deb?
> Or
> gem fetch bundler, then gem2tgz, dh-make-ruby
/me had got the results as attached, true the package name must be
bundle*r*, rather than bundle. We remove the current package and redo it,
thank you.
Reconfirming steps :
Just gem2deb?
Or
gem fetch bundler, then gem2tgz, dh-make-ruby foo-1.2.tar.gz, edited the
copyrights and controls file and us
Hello Lucas,
On 18/04/11 23:17, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> on rewriting the Debian ruby policy: I don't think that a policy is
> necessary if we standardize on gem2deb. The RubyInWheezy wiki page is a
> de-facto documentation of how ruby packaging should be done.
No. For one, the X[SB]-Ruby-* f
On 18/04/11 at 22:35 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote:
> Shall i remove it and re-dput ? Just gem2deb or gem fetch bundler, then
> gem2tgz, dh-make-ruby foo-1.2.tar.gz, edited the copyrights and controls
> file and used pbuilder to create the deb, sign the required files and then a
> dput?
I get this:
***
Hi,
You miss the
XB-Ruby-Versions: ${ruby:Versions}
line in debian/control. This line is needed so that we can track the
status of the transition.
You currently do not run any tests at build time. There's really nothing
that can be tested at build time?
To avoid the need for:
dh_installm
Please do not use the wiki for discussion. That's what the mailing list
is for.
You suggest writing lintian tags. Could you elaborate?
on rewriting the Debian ruby policy: I don't think that a policy is
necessary if we standardize on gem2deb. The RubyInWheezy wiki page is a
de-facto documentation
Hello there !
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:34 PM,
wrote:
> Your mail to 'Pkg-ruby-extras-commits' with the subject
>
> [SCM] packaging for ctioga2 annotated tag, upstream/0.2, created.
> upstream/0.2
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The reason it is bei
On 18/04/11 at 12:18 +0530, Hemanth H.M wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-bundle".
>
> * Package name: ruby-bundle
> Version : 0.0.1-1
> Upstream Author : Andre Arko
> * URL : http://gembundler.com/
> * License : MIT Lic
12 matches
Mail list logo
